Wintertime Nitrous Oxide Emissions in the San Joaquin Valley of California Estimated from Aircraft Observations
Abstract
Nitrous oxide (N 2 O) is a long-lived greenhouse gas that also destroys stratospheric ozone. N 2 O emissions are uncertain and characterized by high spatiotemporal variability, making individual observations difficult to upscale, especially in mixed land use source regions like the San Joaquin Valley (SJV) of California. Here, we calculate spatially integrated N 2 O emission rates using nocturnal and convective boundary-layer budgeting methods. We utilize vertical profile measurements from the NASA DISCOVER-AQ (Deriving Information on Surface Conditions from COlumn and VERtically Resolved Observations Relevant to Air Quality) campaign, which took place January-February, 2013. For empirical constraints on N 2 O source identity, we analyze N 2 O enhancement ratios with methane, ammonia, carbon dioxide, and carbon monoxide separately in the nocturnal boundary layer, nocturnal residual layer, and convective boundary layer. We find that an established inventory (EDGAR v4.3.2) underestimates N 2 O emissions by at least a factor of 2.5, that wintertime emissions from animal agriculture are important to annual totals, and that there is evidence for higher N 2 O emissions during the daytime than at night.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Similar non-wildfire XCH4/XCO2 ratios were found in Hanford, about 40 km west of the observation site, from an aircraft study ranging from 35.9-44.4 ppb/ppm during a winter campaign.
“Similar non-wildfire ratios of X CH 4 / X CO 2 were found in Hanford, ∼ 40 km west of our observation site, from an aircraft study ranging from 35.9-44.4(ppb/ppm) during a winter campaign (Herrera et al., 2021).”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Frausto-Vicencio, I., Heerah, S., Meyer, A. G., Parker, H. A., Dubey, M., & Hopkins, F. M. (2023) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-23-4521-2023 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Herrera, S. A., Diskin, G. S., Harward, C., Sachse, G., De Wekker, S. F. J., Yang, M., Choi, Y., Wisthaler, A., Mallia, D. V., & Pusede, S. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Langley Research Center (US)
- University of Virginia , , , ,
- National Suborbital Research Center , , ,
- University of Oslo (NO)
- University of Utah (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pusede, Sally E.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2021-03-24
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4462-4473
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W3137408917
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 0.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Virginia Space Grant Consortium Graduate Student Fellowship program
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
- Keywords
- nitrous oxide emissions, San Joaquin Valley, greenhouse gases, stratospheric ozone depletion, nocturnal boundary layer, convective boundary layer, animal agriculture, DISCOVER-AQ, spatiotemporal variation
- MeSH terms
- Agriculture, Air Pollutants, Aircraft, Animals, California, Methane, Nitrous Oxide
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review