The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unraveling the High-Activity Origin of Single-Atom Iron Catalysts for Organic Pollutant Oxidation via Peroxymonosulfate Activation
Abstract
Single-atom catalysts (SACs) have emerged as efficient materials in the elimination of aqueous organic contaminants; however, the origin of high activity of SACs still remains elusive. Herein, we identify an 8.1-fold catalytic specific activity (reaction rate constant normalized to catalyst’s specific surface area and dosage) enhancement that can be fulfilled with a single-atom iron catalyst (SA-Fe-NC) prepared via a cascade anchoring method compared to the iron nanoparticle-loaded catalyst, resulting in one of the most active currently known catalysts in peroxymonosulfate (PMS) conversion for organic pollutant oxidation. Experimental data and theoretical results unraveled that the high-activity origin of the SA-Fe-NC stems from the Fe–pyridinic N 4 moiety, which dramatically increases active sites by not only creating the electron-rich Fe single atom as the catalytic site but also producing electron-poor carbon atoms neighboring pyridinic N as binding sites for PMS activation including synchronous PMS reduction and oxidation together with dissolved oxygen reduction. Moreover, the SA-Fe-NC exhibits excellent stability and applicability to realistic industrial wastewater remediation. This work offers a novel yet reasonable interpretation for why a small amount of iron in the SA-Fe-NC can deliver extremely superior specific activity in PMS activation and develops a promising catalytic oxidation system toward actual environmental cleanup.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wang, J., & Wang, S. (2018) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.059 · Cited by 4,087
Advanced Oxidation Processes for Wastewater Treatment: Formation of Hydroxyl Radical and Application
WANG, J. L., & XU, L. J. (2012) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2010.507698 · Cited by 1,586
Metal-Free Carbocatalysis in Advanced Oxidation Reactions
Duan, X., Sun, H., & Wang, S. (2018) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00535 · Cited by 1,329
Cited by
The debatable role of singlet oxygen in persulfate-based advanced oxidation processes
Wang, L., Xiao, K., & Zhao, H. (2023) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2023.119925 · Cited by 384
Huang, B., Wu, Z., Wang, X., Song, X., Zhou, H., Zhang, H., Zhou, P., Liu, W., Xiong, Z., & Lai, B. (2023) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.3c05509 · Cited by 281
MgAl2O4 Incorporated Catalytic Ceramic Membrane for Catalytic Ozonation of Organic Pollutants
Bai, H., Liang, L., Cao, P., Zhang, H., Chen, S., Yu, H., & Quan, X. (2024) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.123527 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, Y., Zhu, Y., Li, T., Chen, Z., Jiang, Q., Zhao, Z., Liang, X., & Hu, C.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2021-05-24
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 8318-8328
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W3165849097
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.