Cited by 14Mercury impact and mitigation studiesAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsMarine and coastal ecosystems

Latitudinal Distribution of Gaseous Elemental Mercury in Tropical Western Pacific: The Role of the Doldrums and the ITCZ

Yue, Fange, Xie, Zhouqing, Zhang, Yanxu, Yan, Jinpei, Zhao, Shuhui·2022·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

The role of the tropical western Pacific in the latitudinal distribution of atmospheric mercury is still unclear. In this study, we conducted continuous measurements of gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) in the marine boundary layer (MBL) along a large latitudinal transect (∼60° S to ∼30° N) of the western Pacific, accompanied by measurements of dissolved gaseous mercury (DGM) in the surface seawater. We found that the GEM latitudinal gradient is the most significant in the tropical western Pacific, which to some extent might be attributed to the impact of the doldrums and the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) in this area. For the doldrums, calm weather may delay the transport of GEM, facilitating its accumulation in the tropical western Pacific. Furthermore, the regional transport, and low O 3 and sea-salt aerosol levels in this area which would not favor the oxidation of GEM in the MBL, would intensify the accumulation of GEM in the tropical western Pacific. For the ITCZ, the vast wet deposition of Hg would drive elevated DGM in the surface seawater, which can increase the evasion flux and may further influence the spatial distribution of GEM. This study provides insight into the role of the tropical western Pacific in the regional atmospheric mercury cycle.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.1c07229

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Yue, F., Xie, Z., Zhang, Y., Yan, J., & Zhao, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Nanjing University (CN)
  • Ministry of Natural Resources (CN)
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2022-02-10
Volume
56
Issue
5
Pages
2968-2976
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W4211124129
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China (IRASCC2020-2022-No.01-01-02E)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (41930532, 41941014)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Mercury impact and mitigation studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
Keywords
gaseous elemental mercury, latitudinal distribution, tropical western Pacific, doldrums, Intertropical Convergence Zone, sea salt aerosol, mercury oxidation, wet deposition, mercury evasion, marine boundary layer
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, Environmental Monitoring, Gases, Mercury, Oxidation-Reduction, Seawater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review