The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inorganic Scaling in Membrane Desalination: Models, Mechanisms, and Characterization Methods
Abstract
Inorganic scaling caused by precipitation of sparingly soluble salts at supersaturation is a common but critical issue, limiting the efficiency of membrane-based desalination and brine management technologies as well as other engineered systems. A wide range of minerals including calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, and silica precipitate during membrane-based desalination, limiting water recovery and reducing process efficiency. The economic impact of scaling on desalination processes requires understanding of its sources, causes, effects, and control methods. In this Critical Review, we first describe nucleation mechanisms and crystal growth theories, which are fundamental to understanding inorganic scale formation during membrane desalination. We, then, discuss the key mechanisms and factors that govern membrane scaling, including membrane properties, such as surface roughness, charge, and functionality, as well as feedwater characteristics, such as pH, temperature, and ionic strength. We follow with a critical review of current characterization techniques for both homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation, focusing on the strengths and limitations of each technique to elucidate scale-inducing mechanisms, observe actual crystal growth, and analyze the outcome of scaling behaviors of desalination membranes. We conclude with an outlook on research needs and future research directions to provide guidelines for scale mitigation in water treatment and desalination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plummer, L. N., & Busenberg, E. (1982) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(82)90056-4 · Cited by 1,886
A Review of Classical and Nonclassical Nucleation Theories
Karthika, S., Radhakrishnan, T. K., & Kalaichelvi, P. (2016) · Crystal Growth & Design · doi:10.1021/acs.cgd.6b00794 · Cited by 868
Habraken, W. J. E. M., Tao, J., Brylka, L. J., Friedrich, H., Bertinetti, L., Schenk, A. S., Verch, A., Dmitrovic, V., Bomans, P. H. H., Frederik, P. M., et al. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2490 · Cited by 821
Cited by
Shao, S., Zeng, F., Long, L., Zhu, X., Peng, L. E., Wang, F., Yang, Z., & Tang, C. Y. (2022) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c04736 · Cited by 355
More resilient polyester membranes for high-performance reverse osmosis desalination
Yao, Y., Zhang, P., Sun, F., Zhang, W., Li, M., Sha, G., Teng, L., Wang, X., Huo, M., DuChanois, R. M., et al. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adk0632 · Cited by 280
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rolf, J., Cao, T., Huang, X., Boo, C., Li, Q., & Elimelech, M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2022-06-06
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 7484-7511
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W4281753442
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.