Regionalized Life-Cycle Water Impacts of Microalgal-Based Biofuels in the United States
Open accessAbstract
While algal biofuels have the potential to reduce the national reliance on fossil fuels, high water consumption associated with algal biomass cultivation represents a major concern potentially compromising the sustainable commercialization of this technology. This study focuses on quantifying the water footprint (WF) and water scarcity footprint (WSF) of renewable diesel derived from algal biomass and provides insights into where algal cultivation is less water-intensive than traditional ethanol and biodiesel feedstocks. Results are generated with an engineering process model developed to predict the life-cycle water consumption, considering green, blue, and gray water, of algae facilities across the United States at a high spatiotemporal resolution. The total WFs for Florida and Arizona are determined to be 13.1 and 17.6 m 3 GJ –1, respectively. The blue WF in Arizona is shown to be 8.5 times larger than in Florida, while the green WF is 4.5 times smaller, but when combined into a total WF, there is just a 26% difference between the two locations. The analysis reveals that the total life-cycle WFs of algal renewable diesel are smaller than the optimal WFs of corn ethanol and soybean biodiesel. Algal systems benefit from higher growth rates and offer the opportunity to manage wastewater streams, therefore generating smaller green and gray WFs than those of conventional biofuels. The WSF analysis identifies the Gulf Coast as the most suitable region for algal cultivation, with cultivation in the western US shown to exacerbate local water stress levels.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous modeling efforts have leveraged dynamic thermal models to estimate potential facility downtime caused by pond freezing events but neglect the effects of pest contamination.
“In addition, previous modeling efforts [5], [13], [14] have leveraged dynamic thermal models to estimate potential facility downtime caused by pond freezing events but neglect the effects of pest contamination.”
From Implications of Pond Reliability on the Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Environmental Impacts of Algal Biofuels (2024) · cites this paper as [13]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Environmental Life Cycle Comparison of Algae to Other Bioenergy Feedstocks
Clarens, A. F., Resurreccion, E. P., White, M. A., & Colosi, L. M. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es902838n · Cited by 1,118 · see citing works
Boulay, A.-M., Bare, J., Benini, L., Berger, M., Lathuillière, M. J., Manzardo, A., Margni, M., Motoshita, M., Núñez, M., Pastor, A. V., et al. (2018) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-017-1333-8 · Cited by 849 · see citing works
Chen, P. H., & Quinn, J. C. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116613 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Self-citationGeographical assessment of microalgae biofuels potential incorporating resource availability
Quinn, J. C., Catton, K. B., Johnson, S., & Bradley, T. H. (2013) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-012-9277-0 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Greene, J. M., Quiroz, D., Limb, B. J., & Quinn, J. C. (2025) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.4c06742 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationProspective Life Cycle Assessment of Sustainable Aviation Fuel Systems
Quiroz, D., Greene, J. M., Limb, B. J., & Quinn, J. C. (2025) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5c09113 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationQuiroz, D., McGowen, J., & Quinn, J. C. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143178 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Quiroz, D., Greene, J. M., & Quinn, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Colorado State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Quinn, Jason C.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2022-10-13
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 16400-16409
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W4304976680
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.osti.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (DE-EE0008906)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
- Keywords
- algal biofuels, water footprint, water scarcity footprint, renewable diesel, microalgae cultivation, green water, blue water, greywater, corn ethanol, soybean biodiesel, wastewater management, algal biomass
- MeSH terms
- Ethanol, Fossil Fuels, United States, Biomass, Biofuels, Microalgae, Wastewater
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review