Cited by 106Microplastics and Plastic PollutionEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Nanoplastic Exposure at Environmental Concentrations Disrupts Hepatic Lipid Metabolism through Oxidative Stress Induction and Endoplasmic Reticulum Homeostasis Perturbation

Wang, Weiyu, Mao, Xuan, Zhang, Rui, Zhou, Xiao-Xia, Liu, Yujiao, Zhou, Hongyu, Jia, Jianbo, Yan, Bing·2023·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the mechanism underlying the perturbation of hepatic lipid metabolism in response to micro/nanoplastic (MP/NP) exposure at environmentally relevant concentrations. Polystyrene (PS) MPs/NPs with different sizes (0.1, 0.5, and 5.0 μm) were studied for their effects on the homeostasis and function of Nile tilapia ( Oreochromis niloticus ) liver. Results showed that PS MPs/NPs were readily internalized and accumulated in various internal organs/tissues, especially in fish liver and muscle. Smaller-sized NPs caused more severe toxicity than larger MPs, including hepatic steatosis, inflammatory response, and disturbed liver function. Mechanistically, PS NPs with a particle size of 100 nm perturbed protein homeostasis in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by inhibiting the expression of chaperone proteins and genes involved in ER-associated degradation. This led to the activation of the PERK-eIF2α pathway, which caused dysfunction of hepatic lipid metabolism. Induction of oxidative stress and activation of the Nrf2/Keap1 pathway were also involved in the PS NP-induced hepatic lipid accumulation. These findings highlight the potential adverse effects of environmental MPs/NPs on aquatic organisms, raising concerns about their ecotoxicity and food safety.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.3c02769

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Nile tilapia, 0.1 μm polystyrene nanoparticles accumulate in the gills at levels 3.4-fold higher than 0.5 μm polystyrene nanoparticles, with approximately 0.8 μg per gram detected in the gills.

    “For instance, in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), 0.1 µm polystyrene nanoparticles accumulate in the gills at levels 3.4-fold higher than those of 0.5 µm polystyrene nanoparticles, with approximately 0.8 µg per gram detected in the gills (Wang et al., 2023).”
  • Smaller nanoparticles exhibit enhanced bioavailability and organ penetration compared to larger nanoparticles.

    “Studies have indicated that nanoparticle size plays a critical role in their absorption and distribution within tissues, with smaller particles exhibiting enhanced bioavailability and organ penetration (Wang et al., 2023).”
  • The exposure concentrations of 0.1 to 10 μg/mL reflect levels found in natural water and marine environments.

    “The exposure concentrations, ranging from 0.1 to 10 µg/mL, were selected to ensure adequate exposure and reflect levels found in natural water and marine environments (Wang et al., 2023).”
  • Concentrations of microplastics and nanoplastics in natural water and marine environments typically range from 6.35×10−3 to 6.94×103 μg/L.

    “The concentrations of microplastics and nanoplastics in natural water and marine environments are typically reported to range from 6.35×10−3 to 6.94×103 μg/L.”
  • Laboratory studies often employ higher concentrations (1-100 mg/L) to assess toxicological effects.

    “However, laboratory studies often employ higher concentrations (1–100 mg/L) to assess the toxicological effects (Wang et al., 2023).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 63 · Cited by 106

Authors
Wang, W., Mao, X., Zhang, R., Zhou, X.-X., Liu, Y., Zhou, H., Jia, J., & Yan, B.
Affiliations
  • Guangzhou University (CN)
  • Institute of Environmental Research at Greater Bay Area, Key Laboratory for Water Quality and Conservation of the Pearl River Delta, Ministry of Education, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
Corresponding author
  • Zhou, Hongyu
  • Jia, Jianbo
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2023-09-08
Volume
57
Issue
38
Pages
14127-14137
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W4386553643
Cited by
106
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 2
FWCI
7.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Guangzhou University (RC2023013)
  • Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (2021A1515010353, 2023A1515012978)
  • Guangdong Provincial Pearl River Talents Program (2019ZT08L387)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (22036002, 22276042)
  • Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangzhou (202201010629, 202201020232)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
nanoplastics, microplastics, polystyrene, hepatic lipid metabolism, hepatic steatosis, Oreochromis niloticus, endoplasmic reticulum stress, ER-associated degradation, PERK-eIF2α pathway, oxidative stress, Nrf2/Keap1 pathway, particle size effects, fish liver, aquatic toxicity, food safety
MeSH terms
Kelch-Like ECH-Associated Protein 1, Microplastics, Animals, Endoplasmic Reticulum, Homeostasis, Liver, Oxidative Stress, Lipid Metabolism, NF-E2-Related Factor 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review