Beyond Particle Effects: Leachate-Induced Duckweed Toxicity from PBAT and PLA under Global Warming
Abstract
Mounting evidence confirms that microplastics (MPs) pose ecological risks. Despite the environmental relevance of aged MPs under warming, little is known about their particle versus leachate toxicity. Here, we mechanistically quantify these contributions in the duckweed Spirodela polyrhiza at concentrations of 10–500 mg L –1 . Our results reveal polymer- and end point-specific effects, indicating distinct modes of action. While particle effects dominated the toxicity of polyvinyl chloride (PVC, 55.2–86.2%) and polystyrene (PS, 50.5–67.1%), the toxicity of poly(butylene adipate- co -terephthalate) (PBAT) and polylactic acid (PLA) was primarily driven by their leachates (51.1–78.5% and 54.0–91.7%, respectively). High-risk chemical candidates, including docosanamide, pyrene, hexadecanamide, nonanoic acid, stearic acid, oxepanone, and adipic acid, were further identified and prioritized within the leachates from PLA and PBAT through nontarget screening via HPLC-MS and integration with the Toxicological Priority Index (ToxPi) framework. Although elevated temperatures enhanced chemical leaching, the resulting toxicity did not increase proportionally. By elucidating how particles and leachates differentially drive MP toxicity in a polymer-specific manner under warming, this work provides critical insights for developing mechanism-driven risk assessment frameworks.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Twenty years of microplastic pollution research—what have we learned?
Thompson, R. C., Courtene-Jones, W., Boucher, J., Pahl, S., Raubenheimer, K., & Koelmans, A. A. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adl2746 · Cited by 1,521 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Song, Z., Guo, Q., He, L., Li, H., Huang, Y., & Dang, F.
- Affiliations
- Shaanxi Normal University (CN)
- School of Geography and Tourism
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Jinan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Dang, Fei
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2026-04-10
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 12479-12488
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W7153109794
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3
- FWCI
- 5.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC3709600, 2023YFC3711400)
- Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20220092)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (42222702, 42277207, 42577468)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
- Keywords
- microplastics, leachate toxicity, poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate), polylactic acid, Spirodela polyrhiza, duckweed, global warming, polymer aging, polyvinyl chloride, polystyrene, pyrene, nonanoic acid, stearic acid, adipic acid, non-target screening, risk assessment
- MeSH terms
- Microplastics, Polyesters, Polymers, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Araceae, Global Warming
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review