The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Continuous Bulk FeCuC Aerogel with Ultradispersed Metal Nanoparticles: An Efficient 3D Heterogeneous Electro-Fenton Cathode over a Wide Range of pH 3–9
Abstract
Novel iron-copper-carbon (FeCuC) aerogel was fabricated through a one-step process from metal-resin precursors and then activated with CO2 and N2 in environmentally friendly way. The activated FeCuC aerogel was applied in a heterogeneous electro-Fenton (EF) process and exhibited higher mineralization efficiency than homogeneous EF technology. High total organic carbon (TOC) removal of organic pollutants with activated FeCuC aerogel was achieved at a wide range of pH values (3-9). The chemical oxygen demand (COD) of real dyeing wastewater was below China's discharge standard after 30 min of treatment, and the specific energy consumption was low (9.2 kW·h·kg(-1)COD(-1)), corresponding to a power consumption of only ∼0.34 kW·h per ton of wastewater. The enhanced mineralization efficiency of FeCuC aerogel was mostly attributable to ultradispersed metallic Fe-Cu nanoparticles embedded in 3D carbon matrix and the CO2-N2 treatment. The CO2 activation enhanced the accessibility of the aerogel's pores, and the secondary N2 activation enlarged the porosity and regenerated the ultradispersed zerovalent iron (Fe(0)) with reductive carbon. Cu(0) acted as a reduction promoter for interfacial electron transfer. Moreover, activated FeCuC aerogel presented low iron leaching (<0.1 ppm) in acidic solution and can be molded into different sizes with high flexibility. Thus, this material could be used as a low-cost cathode and efficient heterogeneous EF technology for actual wastewater treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fang, G., Gao, J., Liu, C., Dionysiou, D. D., Wang, Y., & Zhou, D. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es4048126 · Cited by 802
Cited by
Conductive diamond: synthesis, properties, and electrochemical applications
Yang, N., Yu, S., Macpherson, J. V., Einaga, Y., Zhao, H., Zhao, G., Swain, G. M., & Jiang, X. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00757d · Cited by 522
Self-citationLuo, H., Zeng, Y., He, D., & Pan, X. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.127191 · Cited by 409
Deng, F., Olvera-Vargas, H., Zhou, M., Qiu, S., Sirés, I., & Brillas, E. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00684 · Cited by 409
Sludge biochar-based catalysts for improved pollutant degradation by activating peroxymonosulfate
Huang, B.-C., Jiang, J., Huang, G.-X., & Yu, H.-Q. (2018) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c8ta02282h · Cited by 391
Current advances and trends in electro-Fenton process using heterogeneous catalysts – A review
Poza-Nogueiras, V., Rosales, E., Pazos, M., & Sanromán, M. Á. (2018) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.002 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, H., Qian, L., Guan, X., Wu, D., & Zhao, G.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-04-27
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 5225-5233
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2336309796
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.