The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding, Monitoring, and Controlling Biofilm Growth in Drinking Water Distribution Systems
Open accessAbstract
In drinking water distribution systems (DWDS), biofilms are the predominant mode of microbial growth, with the presence of extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) protecting the biomass from environmental and shear stresses. Biofilm formation poses a significant problem to the drinking water industry as a potential source of bacterial contamination, including pathogens, and, in many cases, also affecting the taste and odor of drinking water and promoting the corrosion of pipes. This article critically reviews important research findings on biofilm growth in DWDS, examining the factors affecting their formation and characteristics as well as the various technologies to characterize and monitor and, ultimately, to control their growth. Research indicates that temperature fluctuations potentially affect not only the initial bacteria-to-surface attachment but also the growth rates of biofilms. For the latter, the effect is unique for each type of biofilm-forming bacteria; ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, for example, grow more-developed biofilms at a typical summer temperature of 22 °C compared to 12 °C in fall, and the opposite occurs for the pathogenic Vibrio cholerae. Recent investigations have found the formation of thinner yet denser biofilms under high and turbulent flow regimes of drinking water, in comparison to the more porous and loosely attached biofilms at low flow rates. Furthermore, in addition to the rather well-known tendency of significant biofilm growth on corrosion-prone metal pipes, research efforts also found leaching of growth-promoting organic compounds from the increasingly popular use of polymer-based pipes. Knowledge of the unique microbial members of drinking water biofilms and, importantly, the influence of water characteristics and operational conditions on their growth can be applied to optimize various operational parameters to minimize biofilm accumulation. More-detailed characterizations of the biofilm population size and structure are now feasible with fluorescence microscopy (epifluorescence and CLSM imaging with DNA, RNA, EPS, and protein and lipid stains) and electron microscopy imaging (ESEM). Importantly, thorough identification of microbial fingerprints in drinking water biofilms is achievable with DNA sequencing techniques (the 16S rRNA gene-based identification), which have revealed a prevalence of previously undetected bacterial members. Technologies are now moving toward in situ monitoring of biomass growth in distribution networks, including the development of optical fibers capable of differentiating biomass from chemical deposits. Taken together, management of biofilm growth in water distribution systems requires an integrated approach, starting from the treatment of water prior to entering the networks to the potential implementation of "biofilm-limiting" operational conditions and, finally, ending with the careful selection of available technologies for biofilm monitoring and control. For the latter, conventional practices, including chlorine-chloramine disinfection, flushing of DWDS, nutrient removal, and emerging technologies are discussed with their associated challenges.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Andrews, S. C., Robinson, A. K., & Rodríguez-Quiñones, F. (2003) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0168-6445(03)00055-x · Cited by 2,702
A component of innate immunity prevents bacterial biofilm development
Singh, P. K., Parsek, M. R., Greenberg, E. P., & Welsh, M. J. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/417552a · Cited by 1,026
Should we stay or should we go: mechanisms and ecological consequences for biofilm dispersal
McDougald, D., Rice, S. A., Barraud, N., Steinberg, P. D., & Kjelleberg, S. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2695 · Cited by 881
Self-citationvan Loosdrecht, M. C., Lyklema, J., Norde, W., Schraa, G., & Zehnder, A. J. (1987) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.53.8.1898-1901.1987 · Cited by 725
Barraud, N., Storey, M. V., Moore, Z. P., Webb, J. S., Rice, S. A., & Kjelleberg, S. (2009) · Microbial Biotechnology · doi:10.1111/j.1751-7915.2009.00098.x · Cited by 289
Self-citationCell density-regulated recovery of starved biofilm populations of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria
Batchelor, S. E., Cooper, M., Chhabra, S. R., Glover, L. A., Stewart, G. S., Williams, P., & Prosser, J. I. (1997) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.63.6.2281-2286.1997 · Cited by 187
Wonoputri, V., Gunawan, C., Liu, S., Barraud, N., Yee, L. H., Lim, M., & Amal, R. (2015) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.5b07971 · Cited by 38
Self-citation
Cited by
Siddiqui, S. I., Manzoor, O., Mohsin, M., & Chaudhry, S. A. (2019) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2018.11.044 · Cited by 184
Towards the biofilm characterization and regulation in biological wastewater treatment
Huang, H., Peng, C., Peng, P., Lin, Y., Zhang, X., & Ren, H. (2019) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-018-9511-6 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, S., Gunawan, C., Barraud, N., Rice, S. A., Harry, E. J., & Amal, R.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-08-16
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 8954-8976
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2504135939
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 11.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding, Monitoring, and Controlling Biofilm Growth in Drinking Water Distribution Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.est.6b00835
- The paper
- Liu, S., Gunawan, C., Barraud, N., Rice, S. A., Harry, E. J., & Amal, R. (2016). Understanding, Monitoring, and Controlling Biofilm Growth in Drinking Water Distribution Systems. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00835
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.