Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 415

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficient and Selective Uptake of TcO4– by a Cationic Metal–Organic Framework Material with Open Ag+ Sites

Sheng, Daopeng, Zhu, Lin, Xu, Chao, Xiao, Chengliang, Wang, Yanlong, Wang, Yaxing, Chen, Lanhua, Diwu, Juan, Chen, Jing, Chai, Zhifang, Albrecht-Schmitt, Thomas E., Wang, Shuao·2017·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

99 Tc is one of the most problematic radioisotopes in used nuclear fuel owing to its combined features of high fission yield, long half-life, and high environmental mobility. There are only a handful of functional materials that can remove TcO 4 – anion from aqueous solution and identifying for new, stable materials with high anion-exchange capacities, fast kinetics, and good selectivity remains a challenge. We report here an 8-fold interpenetrated three-dimensional cationic metal–organic framework material, SCU-100, which is assembled from a tetradentate neutral nitrogen-donor ligand and two-coordinate Ag + cations as potential open metal sites. The structure also contains a series of 1D channels filled with unbound nitrate anions. SCU-100 maintains its crystallinity in aqueous solution over a wide pH range from 1 to 13 and exhibits excellent β and γ radiation-resistance. Initial anion exchange studies show that SCU-100 is able to both quantitatively and rapidly remove TcO 4 – from water within 30 min. The exchange capacity for the surrogate ReO 4 – reaches up to 541 mg/g and the distribution coefficient K d is up to 1.9 × 10 5 mL/g, which are significantly higher than all previously tested inorganic anion sorbent materials. More importantly, SCU-100 can selectively capture TcO 4 – in the presence of large excess of competitive anions (NO 3 –, SO 4 2–, CO 3 2–, and PO 4 3– ) and remove as much as 87% of TcO 4 – from the Hanford low-level waste melter off-gas scrubber simulant stream within 2 h. The sorption mechanism is well elucidated by single crystal X-ray diffraction, showing that the sorbed ReO 4 – anion is able to selectively coordinate to the open Ag + sites forming Ag–O–Re bonds and a series of hydrogen bonds. This further leads to a single-crystal-to-single-crystal transformation from an 8-fold interpenetrated framework with disordered nitrate anions to a 4-fold interpenetrated framework with fully ordered ReO 4 – anions. This work represents a practical case of TcO 4 – removal by a MOF material and demonstrates the promise of using this type of material as a scavenger for treating anionic radioactive contaminants during the nuclear waste partitioning and remediation processes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.7b00339

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 415

Metadata

Authors
Sheng, D., Zhu, L., Xu, C., Xiao, C., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, L., Diwu, J., Chen, J., Chai, Z., Albrecht-Schmitt, T. E., & Wang, S.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2017-03-03
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
3471-3479
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2588934327
Cited by
415
References
1
FWCI
17.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.