The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-Resolution Air Pollution Mapping with Google Street View Cars: Exploiting Big Data
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Air pollution affects billions of people worldwide, yet ambient pollution measurements are limited for much of the world. Urban air pollution concentrations vary sharply over short distances (≪1 km) owing to unevenly distributed emission sources, dilution, and physicochemical transformations. Accordingly, even where present, conventional fixed-site pollution monitoring methods lack the spatial resolution needed to characterize heterogeneous human exposures and localized pollution hotspots. Here, we demonstrate a measurement approach to reveal urban air pollution patterns at 4–5 orders of magnitude greater spatial precision than possible with current central-site ambient monitoring. We equipped Google Street View vehicles with a fast-response pollution measurement platform and repeatedly sampled every street in a 30-km2 area of Oakland, CA, developing the largest urban air quality data set of its type. Resulting maps of annual daytime NO, NO2, and black carbon at 30 m-scale reveal stable, persistent pollution patterns with surprisingly sharp small-scale variability attributable to local sources, up to 5–8× within individual city blocks. Since local variation in air quality profoundly impacts public health and environmental equity, our results have important implications for how air pollution is measured and managed. If validated elsewhere, this readily scalable measurement approach could address major air quality data gaps worldwide.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Addressing Global Mortality from Ambient PM2.5
Apte, J. S., Marshall, J. D., Cohen, A. J., & Brauer, M. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b01236 · Cited by 995
Self-citationWest, J. J., Cohen, A., Dentener, F., Brunekreef, B., Zhu, T., Armstrong, B., Bell, M. L., Brauer, M., Carmichael, G., Costa, D. L., et al. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b03827 · Cited by 390
Self-citation
Cited by
Historical Redlining Is Associated with Present-Day Air Pollution Disparities in U.S. Cities
Lane, H. M., Morello-Frosch, R., Marshall, J. D., & Apte, J. S. (2022) · Environmental Science & Technology Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.estlett.1c01012 · Cited by 451
Self-citationChambliss, S. E., Pinon, C. P. R., Messier, K. P., LaFranchi, B., Upperman, C. R., Lunden, M. M., Robinson, A. L., Marshall, J. D., & Apte, J. S. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2109249118 · Cited by 156
Self-citationWintertime spatial patterns of particulate matter in Fairbanks, AK during ALPACA 2022
Robinson, E. S., Cesler-Maloney, M., Tan, X., Mao, J., Simpson, W., & DeCarlo, P. F. (2023) · Environmental Science: Atmospheres · doi:10.1039/d2ea00140c · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Apte, J. S., Messier, K. P., Gani, S., Brauer, M., Kirchstetter, T. W., Lunden, M. M., Marshall, J. D., Portier, C. J., Vermeulen, R. C. H., & Hamburg, S. P.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-06-05
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 6999-7008
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2621121878
- Cited by
- 799
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 29.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.