The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Satellite-Based Estimates of Daily NO2 Exposure in China Using Hybrid Random Forest and Spatiotemporal Kriging Model
Abstract
A novel model named random-forest-spatiotemporal-kriging (RF-STK) was developed to estimate the daily ambient NO 2 concentrations across China during 2013–2016 based on the satellite retrievals and geographic covariates. The RF-STK model showed good prediction performance, with cross-validation R 2 = 0.62 (RMSE = 13.3 μg/m 3 ) for daily and R 2 = 0.73 (RMSE = 6.5 μg/m 3 ) for spatial predictions. The nationwide population-weighted multiyear average of NO 2 was predicted to be 30.9 ± 11.7 μg/m 3 (mean ± standard deviation), with a slowly but significantly decreasing trend at a rate of −0.88 ± 0.38 μg/m 3 /year. Among the main economic zones of China, the Pearl River Delta showed the fastest decreasing rate of −1.37 μg/m 3 /year, while the Beijing-Tianjin Metro did not show a temporal trend ( P = 0.32). The population-weighted NO 2 was predicted to be the highest in North China (40.3 ± 10.3 μg/m 3 ) and lowest in Southwest China (24.9 ± 9.4 μg/m 3 ). Approximately 25% of the population lived in nonattainment areas with annual-average NO 2 > 40 μg/m 3 . A piecewise linear function with an abrupt point around 100 people/km 2 characterized the relationship between the population density and the NO 2, indicating a threshold of aggravated NO 2 pollution due to urbanization. Leveraging the ground-level NO 2 observations, this study fills the gap of statistically modeling nationwide NO 2 in China, and provides essential data for epidemiological research and air quality management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine
Friedman, J. H. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013203451 · Cited by 30,731
Cited by
Wei, J., Liu, S., Li, Z., Liu, C., Qin, K., Liu, X., Pinker, R. T., Dickerson, R. R., Lin, J., Boersma, K. F., et al. (2022) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c03834 · Cited by 361
Di, Q., Amini, H., Shi, L., Kloog, I., Silvern, R., Kelly, J., Sabath, M. B., Choirat, C., Koutrakis, P., Lyapustin, A., et al. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b03358 · Cited by 298
Requia, W. J., Di, Q., Silvern, R., Kelly, J. T., Koutrakis, P., Mickley, L. J., Sulprizio, M. P., Amini, H., Shi, L., & Schwartz, J. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c01791 · Cited by 264
Elbarbary, M., Honda, T., Morgan, G., Guo, Y., Guo, Y., Kowal, P., & Negin, J. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17093209 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhan, Y., Luo, Y., Deng, X., Zhang, K., Zhang, M., Grieneisen, M. L., & Di, B.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-03-16
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 4180-4189
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2792404378
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.