The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Updated Global and Oceanic Mercury Budgets for the United Nations Global Mercury Assessment 2018
Abstract
In support of international efforts to reduce mercury (Hg) exposure in humans and wildlife, this paper reviews the literature concerning global Hg emissions, cycling and fate, and presents revised global and oceanic Hg budgets for the 2018 United Nations Global Mercury Assessment. We assessed two competing scenarios about the impacts of 16th - late 19th century New World silver (Ag) mining, which may be the largest human source of atmospheric Hg in history. Consideration of Ag ore geochemistry, historical documents on Hg use, and comparison of the scenarios against atmospheric Hg patterns in environmental archives, strongly support a "low mining emission" scenario. Building upon this scenario and other published work, the revised global budget estimates human activities including recycled legacy emissions have increased current atmospheric Hg concentrations by about 450% above natural levels (prevailing before 1450 AD). Current anthropogenic emissions to air are 2.5 ± 0.5 kt/y. The increase in atmospheric Hg concentrations has driven a ∼ 300% average increase in deposition, and a 230% increase in surface marine waters. Deeper marine waters show increases of only 12-25%. The overall increase in Hg in surface organic soils (∼15%) is small due to the large mass of natural Hg already present from rock weathering, but this figure varies regionally. Specific research recommendations are made to reduce uncertainties, particularly through improved understanding of fundamental processes of the Hg cycle, and continued improvements in emissions inventories from large natural and anthropogenic sources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-1-28473-5 · Cited by 3,828
Mercury as a Global Pollutant: Sources, Pathways, and Effects
Driscoll, C. T., Mason, R. P., Chan, H. M., Jacob, D. J., & Pirrone, N. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es305071v · Cited by 2,518
Self-citationA global assessment of natural sources of atmospheric trace metals
Nriagu, J. O. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/338047a0 · Cited by 1,702
The biogeochemical cycling of elemental mercury: Anthropogenic influences
Mason, R. P., Fitzgerald, W. F., & Morel, F. M. M. (1994) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(94)90046-9 · Cited by 1,064
Self-citationThe Case for Atmospheric Mercury Contamination in Remote Areas
Fitzgerald, W. F., Engstrom, D. R., Mason, R. P., & Nater, E. A. (1998) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es970284w · Cited by 977
Self-citationThe Effect of Submarine Groundwater Discharge on the Ocean
Moore, W. S. (2010) · Annual Review of Marine Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-120308-081019 · Cited by 930
Obrist, D., Kirk, J. L., Zhang, L., Sunderland, E. M., Jiskra, M., & Selin, N. E. (2018) · Ambio · doi:10.1007/s13280-017-1004-9 · Cited by 824
Mercury biogeochemical cycling in the ocean and policy implications
Mason, R. P., Choi, A. L., Fitzgerald, W. F., Hammerschmidt, C. R., Lamborg, C. H., Soerensen, A. L., & Sunderland, E. M. (2012) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2012.03.013 · Cited by 596
Self-citationLegacy impacts of all‐time anthropogenic emissions on the global mercury cycle
Amos, H. M., Jacob, D. J., Streets, D. G., & Sunderland, E. M. (2013) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1002/gbc.20040 · Cited by 557
All-Time Releases of Mercury to the Atmosphere from Human Activities
Streets, D. G., Devane, M. K., Lu, Z., Bond, T. C., Sunderland, E. M., & Jacob, D. J. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es202765m · Cited by 542
Cited by
Wu, Y.-S., Osman, A. I., Hosny, M., Elgarahy, A. M., Eltaweil, A. S., Rooney, D. W., Chen, Z., Rahim, N. S., Sekar, M., Gopinath, S. C. B., et al. (2024) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c07047 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Authors
- Outridge, P. M., Mason, R. P., Wang, F., Guerrero, S., & Heimbürger-Boavida, L. E.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-10-03
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 11466-11477
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2890430207
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 14.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Updated Global and Oceanic Mercury Budgets for the United Nations Global Mercury Assessment 2018. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.est.8b01246
- The paper
- Outridge, P. M., Mason, R. P., Wang, F., Guerrero, S., & Heimbürger-Boavida, L. E. (2018). Updated Global and Oceanic Mercury Budgets for the United Nations Global Mercury Assessment 2018. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01246
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.