The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conventional Ultrafiltration As Effective Strategy for Dye/Salt Fractionation in Textile Wastewater Treatment
Open accessAbstract
Use of tight ultrafiltration (UF) membranes has created a new pathway in fractionation of dye/salt mixtures from textile wastewater for sustainable resource recovery. Unexpectedly, a consistently high rejection for the dyes with smaller sizes related to the pore sizes of tight UF membranes is yielded. The potential mechanism involved in this puzzle remains unclear. In this study, seven tailored UF membranes with molecular weight cut-offs (MWCOs) from 6050 to 17530 Da were applied to separate dye/salt mixtures. These UF membranes allowed a complete transfer for NaCl and Na 2 SO 4, due to large pore sizes. Additionally, these UF membranes had acceptably high rejections for direct and reactive dyes, due to the aggregation of dyes as clusters for enhanced sizes and low diffusivity. Specifically, the membrane with an MWCO of 7310 Da showed a complete rejection for reactive blue 2 and direct dyes. An integrated UF-diafiltration process was subsequently designed for fractionation of reactive blue 2/Na 2 SO 4 mixture, achieving 99.84% desalination efficiency and 97.47% dye recovery. Furthermore, reactive blue 2 can be concentrated from 2.01 to 31.80 g·L –1 . These results indicate that UF membranes even with porous structures are promising for effective fractionation of dyes and salts in sustainable textile wastewater treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dye and its removal from aqueous solution by adsorption: A review
Yagub, M. T., Sen, T. K., Afroze, S., & Ang, H. M. (2014) · Advances in Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.cis.2014.04.002 · Cited by 4,357
Domestic Wastewater Treatment as a Net Energy Producer–Can This be Achieved?
McCarty, P. L., Bae, J., & Kim, J. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es2014264 · Cited by 1,792
Advances in water treatment by adsorption technology
Ali, I., & Gupta, V. K. (2006) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.370 · Cited by 1,525
Asghar, A., Abdul Raman, A. A., & Wan Daud, W. M. A. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.010 · Cited by 916
Cake-Enhanced Concentration Polarization: A New Fouling Mechanism for Salt-Rejecting Membranes
Hoek, E. M. V., & Elimelech, M. (2003) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0262636 · Cited by 665
Effects of pH and salt on nanofiltration—a critical review
Luo, J., & Wan, Y. (2013) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2013.03.029 · Cited by 643
Liang, C.-Z., Sun, S.-P., Li, F.-Y., Ong, Y.-K., & Chung, T.-S. (2014) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2014.06.057 · Cited by 525
Lin, J., Ye, W., Baltaru, M.-C., Tang, Y. P., Bernstein, N. J., Gao, P., Balta, S., Vlad, M., Volodin, A., Sotto, A., et al. (2016) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2016.04.057 · Cited by 521
Self-citationFractionation of direct dyes and salts in aqueous solution using loose nanofiltration membranes
Lin, J., Ye, W., Zeng, H., Yang, H., Shen, J., Darvishmanesh, S., Luis, P., Sotto, A., & Van der Bruggen, B. (2015) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2014.12.008 · Cited by 444
Self-citationPunzi, M., Anbalagan, A., Aragão Börner, R., Svensson, B.-M., Jonstrup, M., & Mattiasson, B. (2015) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2015.02.042 · Cited by 253
Cited by
Wang, X., Jiang, J., & Gao, W. (2022) · Water Science and Technology · doi:10.2166/wst.2022.088 · Cited by 266
Polyaniline-based adsorbents for aqueous pollutants removal: A review
Samadi, A., Xie, M., Li, J., Shon, H., Zheng, C., & Zhao, S. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2021.129425 · Cited by 258
Self-citationShehata, N., Egirani, D., Olabi, A. G., Inayat, A., Abdelkareem, M. A., Chae, K.-J., & Sayed, E. T. (2023) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.137993 · Cited by 253
Jahan, N., Tahmid, M., Shoronika, A. Z., Fariha, A., Roy, H., Pervez, M. N., Cai, Y., Naddeo, V., & Islam, M. S. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142215398 · Cited by 143
Berkessa, Y. W., Yan, B., Li, T., Jegatheesan, V., & Zhang, Y. (2020) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124539 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, M., Ye, K., Deng, J., Lin, J., Ye, W., Zhao, S., & Van der Bruggen, B.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-08-17
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 10698-10708
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2885720696
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 12.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conventional Ultrafiltration As Effective Strategy for Dye/Salt Fractionation in Textile Wastewater Treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.est.8b02984
- The paper
- Jiang, M., Ye, K., Deng, J., Lin, J., Ye, W., Zhao, S., & Van der Bruggen, B. (2018). Conventional Ultrafiltration As Effective Strategy for Dye/Salt Fractionation in Textile Wastewater Treatment. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02984
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
