Cited by 78Fecal contamination and water qualityChild Nutrition and Water AccessFood Safety and Hygiene

Do Sanitation Improvements Reduce Fecal Contamination of Water, Hands, Food, Soil, and Flies? Evidence from a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial in Rural Bangladesh

Open access
Ercumen, Ayse, Pickering, Amy J., Kwong, Laura H., Mertens, Andrew, Arnold, Benjamin F., Benjamin-Chung, Jade, Hubbard, Alan E., Alam, Mahfuja +13 more·2018·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Sanitation improvements have had limited effectiveness in reducing the spread of fecal pathogens into the environment. We conducted environmental measurements within a randomized controlled trial in Bangladesh that implemented individual and combined water treatment, sanitation, handwashing (WSH) and nutrition interventions (WASH Benefits, NCT01590095). Following approximately 4 months of intervention, we enrolled households in the trial’s control, sanitation and combined WSH arms to assess whether sanitation improvements, alone and coupled with water treatment and handwashing, reduce fecal contamination in the domestic environment. We quantified fecal indicator bacteria in samples of drinking and ambient waters, child hands, food given to young children, courtyard soil and flies. In the WSH arm, Escherichia coli prevalence in stored drinking water was reduced by 62% (prevalence ratio = 0.38 (0.32, 0.44)) and E. coli concentration by 1-log (Δlog10 = −0.88 (−1.01, −0.75)). The interventions did not reduce E. coli along other sampled pathways. Ambient contamination remained high among intervention households. Potential reasons include noncommunity-level sanitation coverage, child open defecation, animal fecal sources, or naturalized E. coli in the environment. Future studies should explore potential threshold effects of different levels of community sanitation coverage on environmental contamination.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.8b02988

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ercumen, A., Pickering, A. J., Kwong, L. H., Mertens, A., Arnold, B. F., Benjamin-Chung, J., Hubbard, A. E., Alam, M., Sen, D., Islam, S., Rahman, M. Z., Kullmann, C., Chase, C., Ahmed, R., Parvez, S. M., Unicomb, L., Rahman, M., Ram, P. K., Clasen, T., Luby, S. P., & Colford, J. M.
Affiliations
  • North Carolina State University , , , ,
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of California System (US)
  • University of California , , , ,
  • International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research (BD)
  • World Bank (US)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2018-09-26
Volume
52
Issue
21
Pages
12089-12097
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2893251004
Cited by
78
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPPGD759)
  • World Bank Group (NA)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fecal contamination and water quality
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
Keywords
sanitation improvement, fecal contamination, Escherichia coli, fecal indicator bacteria, hand washing, water treatment, household water quality, food contamination, soil contamination, flies, open defecation, rural Bangladesh
MeSH terms
Animals, Bangladesh, Child, Child, Preschool, Diptera, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Infections, Feces, Hand Disinfection, Humans, Sanitation, Soil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review