The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incorporation of Cellulose Nanocrystals (CNCs) into the Polyamide Layer of Thin-Film Composite (TFC) Nanofiltration Membranes for Enhanced Separation Performance and Antifouling Properties
Abstract
To achieve greater separation performance and antifouling properties in a thin-film composite (TFC) nanofiltration membrane, cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) were incorporated into the polyamide layer of a TFC membrane for the first time. The results of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) confirmed the successful formation of the CNC-polyamide composite layer. Surface characterization results revealed differences in the morphologies of the CNC-TFC membranes compared with a control membrane (CNC-TFC-0). Streaming potential measurements and molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) characterizations showed that the CNC-TFC membranes exhibited a greater negative surface charge and a smaller MWCO as the CNC content increased. The CNC-TFC membranes showed enhanced hydrophilicity and increased permeability. With the incorporation of only 0.020 wt % CNCs, the permeability of the CNC-TFC membrane increased by 60.0% over that of the polyamide TFC without CNC. Rejection of Na 2 SO 4 and MgSO 4 by the CNC-TFC membranes was similar to that observed for the CNC-TFC-0 membrane, at values of approximately 98.7% and 98.8%, respectively, indicating that divalent salt rejection was not sacrificed. The monovalent ion rejection tended to increase as the CNC content increased. In addition, the CNC-TFC membranes exhibited enhanced antifouling properties due to their increased hydrophilicity and more negatively charged surfaces.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites
Moon, R. J., Martini, A., Nairn, J., Simonsen, J., & Youngblood, J. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c0cs00108b · Cited by 6,756
Nanocelluloses: A New Family of Nature‐Based Materials
Klemm, D., Kramer, F., Moritz, S., Lindström, T., Ankerfors, M., Gray, D., & Dorris, A. (2011) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201001273 · Cited by 4,465
Liu, S., Zeng, T. H., Hofmann, M., Burcombe, E., Wei, J., Jiang, R., Kong, J., & Chen, Y. (2011) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn202451x · Cited by 2,929
Toxicity of Graphene and Graphene Oxide Nanowalls Against Bacteria
Akhavan, O., & Ghaderi, E. (2010) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn101390x · Cited by 2,606
A review of water treatment membrane nanotechnologies
Pendergast, M. M., & Hoek, E. M. V. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c0ee00541j · Cited by 2,078
Nanofiltration membranes review: Recent advances and future prospects
Mohammad, A. W., Teow, Y. H., Ang, W. L., Chung, Y. T., Oatley-Radcliffe, D. L., & Hilal, N. (2015) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2014.10.043 · Cited by 1,996
Molecular Separation with Organic Solvent Nanofiltration: A Critical Review
Marchetti, P., Jimenez Solomon, M. F., Szekely, G., & Livingston, A. G. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500006j · Cited by 1,758
Interfacial polymerization of thin film nanocomposites: A new concept for reverse osmosis membranes
Jeong, B.-H., Hoek, E. M. V., Yan, Y., Subramani, A., Huang, X., Hurwitz, G., Ghosh, A. K., & Jawor, A. (2007) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2007.02.025 · Cited by 1,307
Solvent resistant nanofiltration: separating on a molecular level
Vandezande, P., Gevers, L. E. M., & Vankelecom, I. F. J. (2008) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b610848m · Cited by 1,155
Tang, C. Y., Kwon, Y.-N., & Leckie, J. O. (2009) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2008.04.003 · Cited by 1,116
Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment—a literature review
Bellona, C., Drewes, J. E., Xu, P., & Amy, G. (2004) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2004.03.034 · Cited by 1,077
Membrane characterization by solute transport and atomic force microscopy
Singh, S., Khulbe, K. C., Matsuura, T., & Ramamurthy, P. (1998) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/s0376-7388(97)00329-3 · Cited by 938
Ghosh, A. K., & Hoek, E. M. V. (2009) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2009.03.024 · Cited by 917
Impacts of reaction and curing conditions on polyamide composite reverse osmosis membrane properties
Ghosh, A. K., Jeong, B., Huang, X., et al. (2007) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2007.11.038 · Cited by 861
Metal–organic frameworks based membranes for liquid separation
Li, X., Liu, Y., Wang, J., Gascon, J., Li, J., & Van der Bruggen, B. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00575j · Cited by 747
Self-citationWater treatment membrane processes
Eaux, L. D. (1996) · McGraw-Hill eBooks · Cited by 706
Cellulose Nanomaterials in Water Treatment Technologies
Carpenter, A. W., de Lannoy, C.-F., & Wiesner, M. R. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es506351r · Cited by 674
Self-citationFouling strategies and the cleaning system of NF membranes and factors affecting cleaning efficiency
Al-Amoudi, A., & Lovitt, R. W. (2007) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2007.06.002 · Cited by 642
Pei, A., Zhou, Q., & Berglund, L. A. (2010) · Composites Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.01.018 · Cited by 524
Nanofiltration membranes with cellulose nanocrystals as an interlayer for unprecedented performance
Wang, J.-J., Yang, H.-C., Wu, M.-B., Zhang, X., & Xu, Z.-K. (2017) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c7ta00501f · Cited by 370
Zhang, C., Wei, K., Zhang, W., Bai, Y., Sun, Y., & Gu, J. (2017) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.6b12826 · Cited by 366
Liu, C., Lee, J., Ma, J., & Elimelech, M. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b05992 · Cited by 284
Liu, M., Chen, Q., Lu, K., Huang, W., Lü, Z., Zhou, C., Yu, S., & Gao, C. (2017) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2016.09.023 · Cited by 262
Zhang, X., Lv, Y., Yang, H.-C., Du, Y., & Xu, Z.-K. (2016) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.6b10693 · Cited by 260
Goh, K., Setiawan, L., Wei, L., Si, R., Fane, A. G., Wang, R., & Chen, Y. (2015) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2014.09.057 · Cited by 234
Wang, J., Wang, Y., Zhu, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, J., & Van der Bruggen, B. (2017) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2017.03.040 · Cited by 224
Ma, L., Qin, H., Cheng, C., Xia, Y., He, C., Nie, C., Wang, L., & Zhao, C. (2014) · J. Mater. Chem. B · doi:10.1039/c3tb21388a · Cited by 177
Chlorine Resistant Glutaraldehyde Crosslinked Polyelectrolyte Multilayer Membranes for Desalination
Cho, K. L., Hill, A. J., Caruso, F., & Kentish, S. E. (2015) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201405783 · Cited by 158
Zhang, R.-X., Braeken, L., Luis, P., Wang, X., & der Bruggen, B. V. (2013) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2013.02.059 · Cited by 153
Polyethersulfone composite membrane blended with cellulose fibrils
Qu, P., Tang, H., Gao, Y., Zhang, L., & Wang, S. (2010) · BioResources · doi:10.15376/biores.5.4.2323-2336 · Cited by 143
Lin, F., Zhang, Q., Yang, Z., Zhang, R., Liu, Y., He, M., Jiang, Z., & Su, Y. (2017) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.7b00159 · Cited by 141
Self-citationSoyekwo, F., Zhang, Q. G., Gao, R., Qu, Y., Lin, C., Huang, X., Zhu, A., & Liu, Q. (2016) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.019 · Cited by 139
Bai, L., Bossa, N., Qu, F., Winglee, J., Li, G., Sun, K., Liang, H., & Wiesner, M. R. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b04280 · Cited by 135
Self-citationYou, X., Ma, T., Su, Y., Wu, H., Wu, M., Cai, H., Sun, G., & Jiang, Z. (2017) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.084 · Cited by 135
Ding, R. F., Zhang, H., Li, Y., Wang, J., Shi, B., Mao, H., Dang, J., & Liu, J. (2015) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2015.08.019 · Cited by 124
Zhang, H., Quan, X., Chen, S., Fan, X., Wei, G., & Yu, H. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b00515 · Cited by 98
A poly(amide-co-ester) nanofiltration membrane using monomers of glucose and trimesoyl chloride
Li, W., Bian, C., Fu, C., Zhou, A., Shi, C., & Zhang, J. (2016) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2015.12.064 · Cited by 77
Cited by
Shao, S., Zeng, F., Long, L., Zhu, X., Peng, L. E., Wang, F., Yang, Z., & Tang, C. Y. (2022) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c04736 · Cited by 355
Selective membranes in water and wastewater treatment: Role of advanced materials
Zuo, K., Wang, K., DuChanois, R. M., Fang, Q., Deemer, E. M., Huang, X., Xin, R., Said, I. A., He, Z., Feng, Y., et al. (2021) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2021.06.013 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Bai, L., Liu, Y., Bossa, N., Ding, A., Ren, N., Li, G., Liang, H., & Wiesner, M. R.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-09-03
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 11178-11187
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2891943508
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 10.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
