Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 319

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 148 of the 148 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biodegradation of Polymeric Mulch Films in Agricultural Soils: Concepts, Knowledge Gaps, and Future Research Directions

Sander, Michael·2019·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

The agricultural use of conventional, polyethylene-based mulch films leads to the accumulation of remnant film pieces in agricultural soils with negative impacts for soil productivity and ecology. A viable strategy to overcome this accumulation is to replace conventional with biodegradable mulch films composed of polymers designed to be degraded by soil microorganisms. However, understanding polymer biodegradation in soils remains a significant challenge due to its dependence on polymer properties, soil characteristics, and prevailing environmental conditions. This perspective aims to advance our understanding of the three fundamental steps underlying biodegradation of mulch films in agricultural soils: colonization of the polymer film surfaces by soil microorganisms, depolymerization of the polymer films by extracellular microbial hydrolases, and subsequent microbial assimilation and utilization of the hydrolysis products for energy production and biomass formation. The perspective synthesizes the current conceptual understanding of these steps and highlights existing knowledge gaps. The discussion addresses future research and analytical advancements required to overcome the knowledge gaps and to identify the key polymer properties and soil characteristics governing mulch film biodegradation in agricultural soils.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.8b05208

Cites

148 of 148 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 148 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. FAO, 2017, The Future of Food and Agriculture – Trends and Challenges
  2. 10.1006/jaer.1997.0154 · doi:10.1006/jaer.1997.0154
  3. Tremblay J.-F., 2018, C&EN Global Enterprise, 96, 18, 10.1021/cen-09603-bus · doi:10.1021/cen-09603-bus
  4. 2018, Plastics - Biodegradable mulch films for use in agriculture and horticulture - Requirements and Test Methods
  5. Ghimire S., 2018, Biodegradable Plastic Mulch and Suitability for Sustainable and Organic Agriculture
  6. Yamamoto M., 2005, Biodegradable Aliphatic-Aromatic Polyesters: “Ecoflex ®;
  7. Parikh, M.; Gross, R. A.; McCarthy, S. P. The effect of crystalline morphology on enzymatic degradation kinetics. Proceedings of the American Chemical Society, Division of Polymeric Materials Science and Engineering , Spring Meeting, 1992; Vol. 66, pp 408–410.
  8. Timmins M. R., 1994, Trends Polym. Sci., 2, 15
  9. Lin T. S., 1978, J. Bacteriol., 133, 942, 10.1128/jb.133.2.942-951.1978 · doi:10.1128/jb.133.2.942-951.1978
  10. Mayberry W. R., 1967, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 15, 1332, 10.1128/am.15.6.1332-1338.1967 · doi:10.1128/am.15.6.1332-1338.1967
  11. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2002.tb00940.x · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2002.tb00940.x · Paper page

Cited by

See all 319

Metadata

Authors
Sander, M.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2019-01-30
Volume
53
Issue
5
Pages
2304-2315
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2914098353
Cited by
319
References
148
FWCI
6.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biodegradation of Polymeric Mulch Films in Agricultural Soils: Concepts, Knowledge Gaps, and Future Research Directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.est.8b05208
The paper
Sander, M. (2019). Biodegradation of Polymeric Mulch Films in Agricultural Soils: Concepts, Knowledge Gaps, and Future Research Directions. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05208

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.