Cited by 133Atmospheric chemistry and aerosolsMunicipal Solid Waste ManagementToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Gridded Emissions of CO, NO x , SO 2 , CO 2 , NH 3 , HCl, CH 4 , PM 2.5 , PM 10 , BC, and NMVOC from Open Municipal Waste Burning in India

Sharma, Gaurav, Sinha, Baerbel, Pallavi, Hakkim, Haseeb, Chandra, Boggarapu Praphulla, Kumar, Ashish, Sinha, Vinayak·2019·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Accurate emission inventories serve as critical inputs for air quality and climate models but are poorly constrained over India. We present a new municipal open waste burning emission inventory from India (OWBEII), at a resolution of 0.1° × 0.1°. Out of the 216 (201–232) Tg y –1 of waste produced in the year 2015, 68 (45–105) Tg y –1 was burned in the open. To determine emissions from waste burning, emission factors of 59 non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs), CH 4, CO 2, CO, and NO x were measured from garbage fires in rural and urban sites in India. The NMVOC emissions from open waste burning of 1.4–2 Tg y –1 increase India’s total anthropogenic NMVOC budget by 8–12%, while BC emissions (40–110 Ggy –1 ) increase the total anthropogenic BC emissions by 8–12%. Open waste burning in India emits 3–7 Tg y –1 of CO and 58–130 Tg y –1 of CO 2 . Emissions increase the total anthropogenic CO and CO 2 in the MIX-Asia inventory by 4–11% and 2–6%, respectively. Open waste burning may affect atmospheric OH reactivity and ozone formation rates downwind of urban centers through the emission of other highly reactive compounds such as acetaldehyde (20–320 Gg y –1 ), propene (50–170 Gg y –1 ), and ethene (50–190 Gg y –1 ) and is s source of carcinogenic benzene (30–280 Gg y –1 ).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.8b07076

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharma, G., Sinha, B., Pallavi, Hakkim, H., Chandra, B. P., Kumar, A., & Sinha, V.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali (IN)
Corresponding author
Sinha, Baerbel
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2019-04-17
Volume
53
Issue
9
Pages
4765-4774
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2935724762
Cited by
133
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5
FWCI
5.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Council for Scientific and Industrial Research
  • Ministry of Human Resource Development
  • Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology (DST/CCP/MRDP/100/2017(G))
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
open waste burning, municipal solid waste, emission inventory, non-methane volatile organic compounds, black carbon, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, methane, sulfur dioxide, ammonia, hydrogen chloride, particulate matter, acetaldehyde, propylene, ethylene, benzene, OH reactivity, ozone formation, India
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, Asia, Carbon Dioxide, India, Particulate Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review