Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does Hydrophilic Polydopamine Coating Enhance Membrane Rejection of Hydrophobic Endocrine-Disrupting Compounds?

Guo, Hao, Deng, Yu, Tao, Zhijia, Yao, Zhikan, Wang, Jianqiang, Lin, Chuner, Zhang, Tong, Zhu, Baoku, Tang, Chuyang Y.·2016·Environmental Science & Technology Letters

Abstract

Endocrine-disrupting compounds (EDCs), an important class of micropollutants with potent adverse health effects, are generally poorly rejected by traditional thin film composite polyamide membranes and thus pose significant risks in membrane-based water reclamation. We hypothesize that membrane rejection of hydrophobic EDCs can be enhanced by a hydrophilic surface coating. Using polydoamine (PDA) as a model hydrophilic coating layer, the PDA-coated NF90 membrane experienced an up to 75% reduction in the passage of bisphenol A compared to the control (NF90 without coating). Meanwhile, we also observed a systematic increase in the level of rejection of three hydrophobic parabens with an increase in PDA coating time. In contrast, there were no systematic changes in the rejection of neutral hydrophilic polyethylene glycol, which suggests that the enhanced rejection of EDCs was due to weakened EDC–membrane hydrophobic interaction. Further sorption tests revealed that the hydrophilic PDA coating could effectively decrease the rate of sorption of EDCs by the membrane, which is responsible for the improved rejection as predicted by the solution–diffusion theory. This study reveals an exciting opportunity for engineering membrane surface properties to enhance the rejection of targeted micropollutants, which has important implications in membrane-based water reclamation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00263

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Guo, H., Deng, Y., Tao, Z., Yao, Z., Wang, J., Lin, C., Zhang, T., Zhu, B., & Tang, C. Y.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
Published
2016-08-17
Volume
3
Issue
9
Pages
332-338
ISSN
2328-8930 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2515066353
Cited by
164
References
2
FWCI
7.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does Hydrophilic Polydopamine Coating Enhance Membrane Rejection of Hydrophobic Endocrine-Disrupting Compounds? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00263
The paper
Guo, H., Deng, Y., Tao, Z., Yao, Z., Wang, J., Lin, C., Zhang, T., Zhu, B., & Tang, C. Y. (2016). Does Hydrophilic Polydopamine Coating Enhance Membrane Rejection of Hydrophobic Endocrine-Disrupting Compounds? Environmental Science & Technology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00263

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.