Cited by 96Carbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesMembrane Separation and Gas TransportZeolite Catalysis and Synthesis

A Review of Porous Adsorbents for the Separation of Nitrogen from Natural Gas

Nandanwar, Sachin U., Corbin, David R., Shiflett, Mark B.·2020·Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Abstract

Natural gas is one of the critical fossil fuel sources in the world to fulfill current energy demand in the global market. Methane is the primary component in natural gas and its concentration is dependent on the source; a variety of impurities, such as nitrogen, carbon dioxide, oxygen, helium, hydrogen sulfide, water, and heavier hydrocarbons can be present, which reduces the overall fuel quality. Purification of natural gas is important in order to meet the U.S. pipeline and minimum heating value specifications. The separation of nitrogen from methane is challenging because of their similar molecular size (i.e., the two gases differ in kinetic diameter by only 0.16 Å). This Review discusses different methods for separating nitrogen from methane. Of these methods, pressure swing adsorption is one of the most effective techniques for separating nitrogen from natural gas using porous adsorbents, and encouraging results have been demonstrated in the past few decades. Many types of porous adsorbents are discussed here, including carbon molecular sieves, activated carbons, zeolites, titanosilicates, and metal–organic frameworks. Future trends and materials are discussed to put into perspective the new opportunities in this research area.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c02730

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Titanosilicate materials ETS-4, CTS-1, Ba-ETS-4, and Sr-ETS-4 have been demonstrated to be excellent adsorbents for nitrogen removal from natural gas at small scale.

    “Titanosilicate materials developed by Engelhard Corporation (now BASF), such as ETS-4, CTS-1, Ba-ETS-4, and Sr-ETS-4, have been demonstrated to be excellent adsorbents for this application at a small scale.448,451,457−459”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nandanwar, S. U., Corbin, D. R., & Shiflett, M. B.
Affiliations
University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
Shiflett, Mark B.
Venue
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2020-07-06
Volume
59
Issue
30
Pages
13355-13369
ISSN
  • 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5045
OpenAlex
W3039498520
Cited by
96
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
Shell
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
Keywords
nitrogen removal, natural gas purification, methane, porous adsorbents, pressure swing adsorption, carbon molecular sieves, activated carbon, zeolites, titanosilicate, metal-organic frameworks, gas separation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review