Biofuel Production Boosted by Plastic Waste: Co-Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Plastic and Biomass toward Sustainable Energy
Abstract
The continuous rise in the global energy demand is coupled with increasing environmental pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. The need to minimize plastic waste accumulation has driven research into alternative and renewable fuel sources. Co-processing plastic waste and biomass through hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) has emerged as a promising approach for biofuel production by leveraging the synergistic properties of these feedstocks. This review explores the potential of plastics and biomass for biofuel production, with a focus on recent advances in HTL techniques. The paper delves into the influences of various parameters, such as temperature, pressure, feedstock ratios, and the synergistic potential of combining various plastics with different biomass feedstocks on the bio-oil yield and quality. It also highlights the environmental and economic benefits of HTL, offering insights from life cycle assessments and techno-economic analyses. The review demonstrates that HTL not only unlocks new pathways for renewable energy but also offers an innovative strategy for managing plastic waste, paving the way for a circular and sustainable bio-economy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Capital costs of pyrolysis, gasification, or HTL plants can be substantial, and resulting oils or syngas often require significant and costly upgrading to meet fuel specifications or chemical feedstock purity.
“However, the capital costs of pyrolysis, gasification, or HTL plants can be substantial, and the resulting oils or syngas often require significant and costly upgrading (e.g., desulfurization, hydrotreatment [396,397]) to meet fuel specifications or chemical feedstock purity requirements [75,354].”
From Biofuels, E-Fuels, and Waste-Derived Fuels: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as [396]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 87 · Cited by 26
- Authors
- Zaman, M. G., Xu, H., Bi, Z., Patel, B., Samec, N., Vujanovic, M., & Guo, Y.
- Affiliations
- Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
- Key Laboratory of Thermo-Fluid Science and Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710049, PR China
- University of South Africa (ZA)
- University of Maribor (SI)
- Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Zagreb SI-2000, Croatia
- Corresponding author
- Guo, Yang
- Venue
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2025-01-17
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1876-1893
- ISSN
- 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5045
- OpenAlex
- W4406520986
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 8
- FWCI
- 6.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFE0206600)
- Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (2024JC-YBMS-105)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
- Keywords
- plastic waste, biomass, bio-oil, biofuel production, feedstock ratio, process parameters, bio-oil quality, life cycle assessment, techno-economic analysis, circular bioeconomy, plastic waste management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review