Cited by 17Fuel Cells and Related MaterialsElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pore Structural Characterization of Fuel Cell Layers Using Integrated Mercury Porosimetry and Computerized X-ray Tomography

Open access
Malik, Shoaib, Smith, Linda, Sharman, Jonathan, Holt, Elizabeth M., Rigby, Sean P.·2016·Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Abstract

The pore structure of the cathode catalyst layer of proton-exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells is a major factor influencing cell performance. The nanostructure of the catalyst layer has been probed using a novel combination of mercury porosimetry with computerized X-ray tomography (CXT), even though the nanopores were below the nominal CXT resolution. The method allows probing of the macroscopic spatial variability in the accessibility of the nanostructure. In particular, mercury entrapment within the catalyst layer showed a pronounced regular spatial patterning corresponding to the already higher X-ray absorbing regions of the fresh catalyst layer. The initial, greater X-ray absorption was due to a higher local concentration of carbon-supported platinum catalyst. This was due to segregation of ionomer away from these areas caused by the particular screen printing catalyst layer deposition method used, which both enhanced the accessibility of the origin regions and, concomitantly, reduced the accessibility of the destination regions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.iecr.6b01617

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1016/S0360-3199(02)00156-8 · DOI
  2. 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000034162.92123.96 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/adfm.201101525 · DOI
  4. 10.1149/06403.0281ecst · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.ces.2011.02.031 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/cjce.5450830122 · DOI
  7. 10.1149/1.3496616 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S1464-1895(99)00081-2 · DOI
  9. Portsmouth R. L., 1992, Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng., 70, 63
  10. 10.1016/0021-9797(91)90212-Q · DOI
  11. 10.1006/jcis.1999.6707 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0032-5910(81)85011-5 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/0032-5910(81)85005-X · DOI
  14. 10.1016/0032-5910(87)80004-9 · DOI
  15. 10.1243/095440803322611679 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Malik, S., Smith, L., Sharman, J., Holt, E. M., & Rigby, S. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Johnson Matthey Technology Centre, Blount’s Court Road, Sonning Common, Reading, United Kingdom
  • Johnson Matthey Process Technology Division, P.O. Box 1, Belasis Avenue, Billingham, Cleveland, United Kingdom
Corresponding author
Rigby, Sean P.
Venue
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2016-10-05
Volume
55
Issue
41
Pages
10850-10859
ISSN
  • 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5045
OpenAlex
W2527178073
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Nottingham
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Keywords
proton exchange membrane fuel cells, cathode catalyst layer, pore structure, mercury intrusion porosimetry, platinum catalysts, screen printing, X-ray absorption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review