Cited by 27Fungal Plant Pathogen ControlPlant Pathogens and ResistancePesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies

Unveiling Vacuolar H + -ATPase Subunit a as the Primary Target of the Pyridinylmethyl-Benzamide Fungicide, Fluopicolide

Open access
Dai, Tan, Yang, Jikun, Zhao, Chuang, Chen, Jinzhu, Zhang, Can, Wang, Zhiwen, Peng, Qin, Liu, Pengfei +2 more·2024·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

An estimated 240 fungicides are presently in use, but the direct targets for the majority remain elusive, constraining fungicide development and efficient resistance monitoring. In this study, we found that Pcα-actinin knockout did not influence the sensitivity of Phytophthora capsici to fluopicolide, which is a notable oomycete inhibitor. Using a combination of Bulk Segregant Analysis Sequencing and Drug Affinity Responsive Target Stability (DARTS) assays, the vacuolar H + -ATPase subunit a (PcVHA-a) was pinpointed as the target protein of fluopicolide. We also confirmed four distinct point mutations in PcVHA-a responsible for fluopicolide resistance in P. capsici through site-directed mutagenesis. Molecular docking, ATPase activity assays, and a DARTS assay suggested a fluopicolide-PcVHA-a interaction. Sequence analysis and further molecular docking validated the specificity of fluopicolide for oomycetes or fish. These findings support the claim that PcVHA-a is the target of fluopicolide, proposing vacuolar H + -ATPase as a promising target for novel fungicide development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c08485

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Dai, T., Yang, J., Zhao, C., Chen, J., Zhang, C., Wang, Z., Peng, Q., Liu, P., Miao, J., & Liu, X.
Affiliations
  • China Agricultural University (CN)
  • Northwest A&F University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Miao, Jianqiang
  • Liu, Xili
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Published
2024-01-09
Volume
72
Issue
3
Pages
1527-1538
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
OpenAlex
W4390748438
Cited by
27
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
10.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFD1400900)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (32001942)
  • Innovation Capability Support Plan of Shaanxi Province (2020TD-035)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogens and Resistance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Keywords
fluopicolide, Phytophthora capsici, point mutations, drug target specificity, molecular docking
MeSH terms
Benzamides, Fungicides, Industrial, Proton-Translocating ATPases, Phytophthora, Plant Diseases, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review