The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generative AI in Education and Research: Opportunities, Concerns, and Solutions
Abstract
In this article, we discuss the role of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in education. The integration of AI in education has sparked a paradigm shift in teaching and learning, presenting both unparalleled opportunities and complex challenges. This paper explores critical aspects of implementing AI in education to advance educational goals, ethical considerations in scientific publications, and the attribution of credit for AI-driven discoveries. We also examine the implications of using AI-generated content in professional activities and describe equity and accessibility concerns. By weaving these key questions into a comprehensive discussion, this article aims to provide a balanced perspective on the responsible and effective use of these technologies in education, highlighting the need for a thoughtful, ethical, and inclusive approach to their integration.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The field also raises concerns about bias, misinformation, and the reliability of AI-generated content, particularly when used without verification in academic settings [2,20].”
From Engineering student perceptions of generative AI use in learning trust judgment and information seeking (2026) · cites this paper as [2]
Citations
Cites
Heffernan, N. T., & Heffernan, C. L. (2014) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-014-0024-x · Cited by 616
The Cognitive Tutor Authoring Tools (CTAT): Preliminary Evaluation of Efficiency Gains
Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., Sewall, J., & Koedinger, K. R. (2006) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11774303_7 · Cited by 218
Emenike, M. E., & Emenike, B. U. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00063 · Cited by 160
Best Practices for Using AI When Writing Scientific Manuscripts
Buriak, J. M., Akinwande, D., Artzi, N., Brinker, C. J., Burrows, C. J., Chan, W. C. W., Chen, C., Chen, X., Chhowalla, M., Chi, L., et al. (2023) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c01544 · Cited by 106
van Peppen, L. M., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Heijltjes, A. E. G., Janssen, E. M., & van Gog, T. (2021) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-021-09559-0 · Cited by 67
Mofield, E. L. (2019) · Gifted Child Today · doi:10.1177/1076217519880588 · Cited by 48
The Effect of EFL Teacher Apprehension and Teacher Burnout on Learners’ Academic Achievement
Wang, Z. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.839452 · Cited by 42
Learning critical thinking skills online: can precision teaching help?
Tan, A. J. Y., Davies, J. L., Nicolson, R. I., & Karaminis, T. N. (2023) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-023-10227-y · Cited by 36
Interactive Tools for Teaching Fourier Transforms
Baiz, C. R. (2020) · The Biophysicist · doi:10.35459/tbp.2019.000102 · Cited by 3
Self-citationAuthorship best practices in biophysics
Baiz, C. R. (2023) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2023.03.009 · Cited by 2
Self-citationPatterns in Authorship: Lessons in Diversity and Justice
Greenberg, A. (2018) · ACS symposium series · doi:10.1021/bk-2018-1291.ch015 · Cited by 1
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Bloom B. S., 1956, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook: The Cognitive Domain
- Iyer, Lenin Critical Thinking and its Importance in Education. Conference: Cognitive, Psychological and Behavioral Perspectives in Education , Karaikudi, India, 2019.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bengesi, S., El-Sayed, H., Sarker, M. K., Houkpati, Y., Irungu, J., & Oladunni, T. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3397775 · Cited by 470
A Comprehensive Review on Generative AI for Education
Mittal, U., Sai, S., Chamola, V., & Sangwan, D. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3468368 · Cited by 383
Darwin, D., Rusdin, D., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., Laksmi, E. D., & Marzuki, M. (2023) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2023.2290342 · Cited by 494
Samala, A. D., Rawas, S., Wang, T., Reed, J. M., Kim, J., Howard, N.-J., & Ertz, M. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12936-0 · Cited by 229
Zhang, L., & Xu, J. (2025) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100978 · Cited by 168
Metadata
- Authors
- Alasadi, E. A., & Baiz, C. R.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Corresponding author
- Baiz, Carlos R.
- ORCID
- Baiz, Carlos R.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Education
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2023-07-27
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2965-2971
- ISSN
- 0021-9584 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-1328
- OpenAlex
- W4385303098
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 113 · 2025: 183 · 2024: 154 · 2023: 13
- FWCI
- 108.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Division of Chemistry (CHE-1847199)
- Welch Foundation (F-1891)
- University of Texas at Austin
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Keywords
- generative AI, artificial intelligence in education, artificial intelligence in research, authorship attribution, AI-generated content, equity and accessibility, responsible AI use, teaching-learning process
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
