A Lab-Based Chemical Escape Room: Educational, Mobile, and Fun!
Abstract
Imagine being locked in a chemical lab with 4 “bombs” that will detonate within 60 min unless you neutralize them. You now must use your brain, chemical knowledge, intuition, and need a bit of luck to neutralize the bombs and escape unharmed... This is the concept behind “chemical escape”, an activity for high-school students, which brings the extremely popular genre of “escape rooms” into the chemistry classroom; it engages students in learning, increases motivation, and bridges the gap between classroom chemistry and the real world, as well as allows for teamwork and peer learning. A mobile escape room was designed and built in Israel; it consisted of lab-based activities and was suitable for high schools. To date, the activity has been introduced to more than 350 chemistry teachers who then implemented it to over 1500 students. An evaluation questionnaire was developed on the basis of students’ statements of their experience of the escape room (bottom-up); the results indicate that the students were highly engaged and motivated during the activity, and there was an appreciation for teachers’ efforts to run the escape room, an increased feeling of efficacy, and effective teamwork. In this paper we provide a detailed description of all the puzzles and an explanation of how to operate it in a school lab.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reviewing educational literature on chemistry-specific EEAs outlines previous examples that serve as instruction to lab techniques, evaluation of student understanding, and complementary teaching of concepts.
“Reviewing educational literature that deals with chemistry-specific EEAs outlines previous examples that serve as (i) instruction to lab techniques, 15 -18 (ii) evaluation of student understanding, 19 -22 and (iii) complementary teaching of concepts. 23,24”
From Fostering Motivation toward Chemistry through Augmented Reality Educational Escape Activities. A Self-Determination Theory Approach (2022) · cites this paper as [17]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Elford, D., Lancaster, S. J., & Jones, G. A. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00428 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
- Authors
- Peleg, R., Yayon, M., Katchevich, D., Moria-Shipony, M., & Blonder, R.
- Affiliations
- Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Peleg, Ran
- Yayon, Malka
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Education
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-03-05
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 955-960
- ISSN
- 0021-9584 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-1328
- OpenAlex
- W2918603319
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 20.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Education (publishedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education of Israel
- Israeli Center for Science and Technology Education
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Various Chemistry Research Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Chemistry Education and Research
- Keywords
- escape rooms, chemistry education, high school students, student engagement, student motivation, teamwork, peer learning, mobile learning, chemistry puzzles, student assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review