Cited by 61Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and DynamicsReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Are Deep Learning Structural Models Sufficiently Accurate for Free-Energy Calculations? Application of FEP+ to AlphaFold2-Predicted Structures

Open access
Beuming, Thijs, Martín, Helena, Díaz-Rovira, Anna M., Díaz, Lucía, Guallar, Victor, Ray, Soumya S.·2022·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

ABSTRACT The availability of AlphaFold2 has led to great excitement in the scientific community - particularly among drug hunters - due to the ability of the algorithm to predict protein structures with high accuracy. However, beyond globally accurate protein structure prediction, it remains to be determined whether ligand binding sites are predicted with sufficient accuracy in these structures to be useful in supporting computationally driven drug discovery programs. We explored this question by performing free energy perturbation (FEP) calculations on a set of well-studied protein-ligand complexes, where AlphaFold2 predictions were performed by removing all templates with >30% identity to the target protein from the training set. We observed that in most cases, the ΔΔG values for ligand transformations calculated with FEP, using these prospective AlphaFold2 structures, were comparable in accuracy to the corresponding calculations previously carried out using X-ray structures. We conclude that under the right circumstances, AlphaFold2 modeled structures are accurate enough to be used by physics-based methods such as FEP, in typical lead optimization stages of a drug discovery program.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00796

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beuming, T., Martín, H., Díaz-Rovira, A. M., Díaz, L., Guallar, V., & Ray, S. S.
Affiliations
  • Latham Biopharm Group, 101 Main Street, Suite 1400, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, United States
  • NOSTRUM BIODISCOVERY S.L., E-08029 Barcelona, Spain
  • Barcelona Supercomputing Center (ES)
  • RA Capital, 200 Berkeley Street, Boston Massachusetts 02116, United States
Corresponding author
  • Beuming, Thijs
  • Ray, Soumya S.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2022-09-13
Volume
62
Issue
18
Pages
4351-4360
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W4295757800
Cited by
61
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 1
FWCI
7.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovaci?n (PTQ2018-009991)
  • RA Capital
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
AlphaFold2, free energy perturbation, protein-ligand binding free energy, ligand binding site prediction, deep learning protein structure prediction, drug discovery, lead optimization, protein-ligand complex, binding affinity
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Ligands, Models, Structural, Prospective Studies, Protein Binding, Proteins, Thermodynamics, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review