Cited by 23Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

Can We Quickly Learn to “Translate” Bioactive Molecules with Transformer Models?

Open access
Tysinger, Emma P., Rai, Brajesh K., Sinitskiy, Anton V.·2023·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Meaningful exploration of the chemical space of druglike molecules in drug design is a highly challenging task due to a combinatorial explosion of possible modifications of molecules. In this work, we address this problem with transformer models, a type of machine learning (ML) model originally developed for machine translation. By training transformer models on pairs of similar bioactive molecules from the public ChEMBL data set, we enable them to learn medicinal-chemistry-meaningful, context-dependent transformations of molecules, including those absent from the training set. By retrospective analysis on the performance of transformer models on ChEMBL subsets of ligands binding to COX2, DRD2, or HERG protein targets, we demonstrate that the models can generate structures identical or highly similar to most active ligands, despite the models having not seen any ligands active against the corresponding protein target during training. Our work demonstrates that human experts working on hit expansion in drug design can easily and quickly employ transformer models, originally developed to translate texts from one natural language to another, to “translate” from known molecules active against a given protein target to novel molecules active against the same target.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01618

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Tysinger, E. P., Rai, B. K., & Sinitskiy, A. V.
Affiliations
  • Pfizer (United States) (US)
  • Machine Learning and Computational Sciences, Pfizer Worldwide Research, Development, and Medical, 610 Main Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States
Corresponding author
Sinitskiy, Anton V.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2023-03-13
Volume
63
Issue
6
Pages
1734-1744
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W4324026004
Cited by
23
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
transformer models, molecular translation, hit expansion, drug design, chemical space exploration, bioactive compounds, ChEMBL, cyclooxygenase-2, DRD2, hERG, protein-ligand binding
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Drug Design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review