The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FEP Protocol Builder: Optimization of Free Energy Perturbation Protocols Using Active Learning
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
have been regularly achieved, which are sufficient to drive potency optimization in modern drug discovery campaigns. Despite the robustness of these FEP approaches across multiple target classes, there are invariably target systems that do not display expected performance with default FEP settings. Traditionally, these systems required labor-intensive manual protocol development to arrive at parameter settings that produce a predictive FEP model. Due to the (a) relatively large parameter space to be explored, (b) significant compute requirements, and (c) limited understanding of how combinations of parameters can affect FEP performance, manual FEP protocol optimization can take weeks to months to complete, and often does not involve rigorous train-test set splits, resulting in potential overfitting. These manual FEP protocol development timelines do not coincide with tight drug discovery project timelines, essentially preventing the use of FEP calculations for these target systems. Here, we describe an automated workflow termed FEP Protocol Builder (FEP-PB) to rapidly generate accurate FEP protocols for systems that do not perform well with default settings. FEP-PB uses an active-learning workflow to iteratively search the protocol parameter space to develop accurate FEP protocols. To validate this approach, we applied it to pharmaceutically relevant systems where default FEP settings could not produce predictive models. We demonstrate that FEP-PB can rapidly generate accurate FEP protocols for the previously challenging MCL1 system with limited human intervention. We also apply FEP-PB in a real-world drug discovery setting to generate an accurate FEP protocol for the p97 system. FEP-PB is able to generate a more accurate protocol than the expert user, rapidly validating p97 as amenable to free energy calculations. Additionally, through the active-learning workflow, we are able to gain insight into which parameters are most important for a given system. These results suggest that FEP-PB is a robust tool that can aid in rapidly developing accurate FEP protocols and increasing the number of targets that are amenable to the technology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Wang, L., Wu, Y., Deng, Y., Kim, B., Pierce, L., Krilov, G., Lupyan, D., Robinson, S., Dahlgren, M. K., Greenwood, J., et al. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja512751q · Cited by 1,313
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 65
- 10.3390/molecules27051496 · DOI
- 10.3389/fphar.2022.1003480 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00116 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsomega.6b00123 · DOI
- Cournia Z., 2021, Free Energy Methods in Drug Discovery: Current State and Future Directions, 1397, 1, 10.1021/bk-2021-1397.ch001 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78756-3 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1114017109 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00826 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10822-022-00494-x · DOI
- 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.2c00541 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00900 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00083 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10822-013-9678-y · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00564 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01272 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01290 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00072 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00118 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00220 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01445 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00505 · DOI
- 10.1039/C5SC02678D · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/jp204407d · DOI
- 10.1021/ct300911a · DOI
- 10.1021/ct400989x · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-019-53133-1 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00538 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-017-04905-0 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.1784436 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00660 · DOI
- Jaques, N.; Gu, S.; Bahdanau, D.; Hernández-Lobato, J. M.; Turner, R. E.; Eck, D. In Sequence Tutor: Conservative Fine-Tuning of Sequence Generation Models with KL-Control , Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2017; pp 1645–1654.
- 10.1186/s13321-017-0235-x · DOI
- 10.1021/jm301448p · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01026 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10822-013-9644-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/0021-9991(76)90078-4 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01346 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00864 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111584 · DOI
- Pezoa, F.; Reutter, J. L.; Suarez, F.; Ugarte, M.; Vrgoč, D. In Foundations of JSON Schema , Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW’16, 2016; pp 263–273. · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz470 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00445 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.061901 · DOI
- 10.1080/17460441.2019.1664468 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.445869 · DOI
- Berendsen, H. J. C.; Postma, J. P. M.; van Gunsteren, W. F.; Hermans, J. In Interaction Models for Water in Relation to Protein Hydration , Proceedings of the Fourteenth Jerusalem Symposium on Quantum Chemistry and Biochemistry, Jerusalem, Israel, April 13–16, 1981; pp 331–342. · DOI
- 10.1021/j100308a038 · DOI
- 10.1021/ct700053u · DOI
- 10.1021/ci4001458 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00475 · DOI
- 10.1002/cmdc.201300156 · DOI
- 10.1021/ci050268f · DOI
- 10.1021/cr00023a004 · DOI
- Wang L., 2019, Biomolecular Simulations: Methods and Protocols, 201
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00356 · DOI
- Lundberg, S.; Lee, S.I. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions 2017 https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/8a20a8621978632d76c43dfd28b67767-Paper.pdf (accessed April 17, 2023).
- 10.1186/s13045-020-01007-9 · DOI
- Chen, T.; Guestrin, C. In XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System , Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; KDD’16, New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp 785–794. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01318 · DOI
- 10.1124/mol.118.114256 · DOI
- 10.3390/molecules20023027 · DOI
- 10.1177/15459683231166937 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ddtec.2021.08.001 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00815 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- de Oliveira, C., Leswing, K., Feng, S., Kanters, R., Abel, R., & Bhat, S.
- Affiliations
- Schrodinger (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bhat, Sathesh
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2023-08-18
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 5592-5603
- ISSN
- 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-960X
- OpenAlex
- W4385969733
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7
- FWCI
- 2.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion)
- ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Keywords
- free energy perturbation, active learning (machine learning), Mcl-1, VCP, drug discovery, parameter space exploration, train-test split, overfitting
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Cisplatin, Etoposide, Tegafur, Humans, Uracil, Drug Discovery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review