Cited by 15Computational Drug Discovery MethodsAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesMachine Learning in Materials Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

FEP Protocol Builder: Optimization of Free Energy Perturbation Protocols Using Active Learning

Open access
de Oliveira, César, Leswing, Karl, Feng, Shulu, Kanters, René, Abel, Robert, Bhat, Sathesh·2023·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

have been regularly achieved, which are sufficient to drive potency optimization in modern drug discovery campaigns. Despite the robustness of these FEP approaches across multiple target classes, there are invariably target systems that do not display expected performance with default FEP settings. Traditionally, these systems required labor-intensive manual protocol development to arrive at parameter settings that produce a predictive FEP model. Due to the (a) relatively large parameter space to be explored, (b) significant compute requirements, and (c) limited understanding of how combinations of parameters can affect FEP performance, manual FEP protocol optimization can take weeks to months to complete, and often does not involve rigorous train-test set splits, resulting in potential overfitting. These manual FEP protocol development timelines do not coincide with tight drug discovery project timelines, essentially preventing the use of FEP calculations for these target systems. Here, we describe an automated workflow termed FEP Protocol Builder (FEP-PB) to rapidly generate accurate FEP protocols for systems that do not perform well with default settings. FEP-PB uses an active-learning workflow to iteratively search the protocol parameter space to develop accurate FEP protocols. To validate this approach, we applied it to pharmaceutically relevant systems where default FEP settings could not produce predictive models. We demonstrate that FEP-PB can rapidly generate accurate FEP protocols for the previously challenging MCL1 system with limited human intervention. We also apply FEP-PB in a real-world drug discovery setting to generate an accurate FEP protocol for the p97 system. FEP-PB is able to generate a more accurate protocol than the expert user, rapidly validating p97 as amenable to free energy calculations. Additionally, through the active-learning workflow, we are able to gain insight into which parameters are most important for a given system. These results suggest that FEP-PB is a robust tool that can aid in rapidly developing accurate FEP protocols and increasing the number of targets that are amenable to the technology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00681

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 65

  1. 10.3390/molecules27051496 · DOI
  2. 10.3389/fphar.2022.1003480 · DOI
  3. 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00116 · DOI
  4. 10.1021/acsomega.6b00123 · DOI
  5. Cournia Z., 2021, Free Energy Methods in Drug Discovery: Current State and Future Directions, 1397, 1, 10.1021/bk-2021-1397.ch001 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78756-3 · DOI
  7. 10.1073/pnas.1114017109 · DOI
  8. 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00826 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s10822-022-00494-x · DOI
  10. 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.2c00541 · DOI
  11. 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00900 · DOI
  12. 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00083 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s10822-013-9678-y · DOI
  14. 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00564 · DOI
  15. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01272 · DOI
  16. 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01290 · DOI
  17. 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00072 · DOI
  18. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00118 · DOI
  19. 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00220 · DOI
  20. 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01445 · DOI
  21. 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00505 · DOI
  22. 10.1039/C5SC02678D · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1021/jp204407d · DOI
  24. 10.1021/ct300911a · DOI
  25. 10.1021/ct400989x · DOI
  26. 10.1038/s41598-019-53133-1 · DOI
  27. 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00538 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/s41598-017-04905-0 · DOI
  29. 10.1063/1.1784436 · DOI
  30. 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00660 · DOI
  31. Jaques, N.; Gu, S.; Bahdanau, D.; Hernández-Lobato, J. M.; Turner, R. E.; Eck, D. In Sequence Tutor: Conservative Fine-Tuning of Sequence Generation Models with KL-Control , Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2017; pp 1645–1654.
  32. 10.1186/s13321-017-0235-x · DOI
  33. 10.1021/jm301448p · DOI
  34. 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01026 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/s10822-013-9644-8 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/0021-9991(76)90078-4 · DOI
  37. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01346 · DOI
  38. 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00864 · DOI
  39. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111584 · DOI
  41. Pezoa, F.; Reutter, J. L.; Suarez, F.; Ugarte, M.; Vrgoč, D. In Foundations of JSON Schema , Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW’16, 2016; pp 263–273. · DOI
  42. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz470 · DOI
  43. 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00445 · DOI
  44. 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.061901 · DOI
  45. 10.1080/17460441.2019.1664468 · DOI
  46. 10.1063/1.445869 · DOI
  47. Berendsen, H. J. C.; Postma, J. P. M.; van Gunsteren, W. F.; Hermans, J. In Interaction Models for Water in Relation to Protein Hydration , Proceedings of the Fourteenth Jerusalem Symposium on Quantum Chemistry and Biochemistry, Jerusalem, Israel, April 13–16, 1981; pp 331–342. · DOI
  48. 10.1021/j100308a038 · DOI
  49. 10.1021/ct700053u · DOI
  50. 10.1021/ci4001458 · DOI
  51. 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00475 · DOI
  52. 10.1002/cmdc.201300156 · DOI
  53. 10.1021/ci050268f · DOI
  54. 10.1021/cr00023a004 · DOI
  55. Wang L., 2019, Biomolecular Simulations: Methods and Protocols, 201
  56. 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00356 · DOI
  57. Lundberg, S.; Lee, S.I. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions 2017 https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/8a20a8621978632d76c43dfd28b67767-Paper.pdf (accessed April 17, 2023).
  58. 10.1186/s13045-020-01007-9 · DOI
  59. Chen, T.; Guestrin, C. In XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System , Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; KDD’16, New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp 785–794. · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01318 · DOI
  61. 10.1124/mol.118.114256 · DOI
  62. 10.3390/molecules20023027 · DOI
  63. 10.1177/15459683231166937 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/j.ddtec.2021.08.001 · DOI
  65. 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00815 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
de Oliveira, C., Leswing, K., Feng, S., Kanters, R., Abel, R., & Bhat, S.
Affiliations
Schrodinger (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Bhat, Sathesh
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2023-08-18
Volume
63
Issue
17
Pages
5592-5603
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W4385969733
Cited by
15
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
Keywords
free energy perturbation, active learning (machine learning), Mcl-1, VCP, drug discovery, parameter space exploration, train-test split, overfitting
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Cisplatin, Etoposide, Tegafur, Humans, Uracil, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review