The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of Enzyme Catalysis by Computing Reaction Energy Barriers via Steered QM/MM Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Machine Learning
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The prediction of enzyme activity is one of the main challenges in catalysis. With computer-aided methods, it is possible to simulate the reaction mechanism at the atomic level. However, these methods are usually expensive if they are to be used on a large scale, as they are needed for protein engineering campaigns. To alleviate this situation, machine learning methods can help in the generation of predictive-decision models. Herein, we test different regression algorithms for the prediction of the reaction energy barrier of the rate-limiting step of the hydrolysis of mono-(2-hydroxyethyl)terephthalic acid by the MHETase of Ideonella sakaiensis . As a training data set, we use steered quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) molecular dynamics (MD) simulation snapshots and their corresponding pulling work values. We have explored three algorithms together with three chemical representations. As an outcome, our trained models are able to predict pulling works along the steered QM/MM MD simulations with a mean absolute error below 3 kcal mol –1 and a score value above 0.90. More challenging is the prediction of the energy maximum with a single geometry. Whereas the use of the initial snapshot of the QM/MM MD trajectory as input geometry yields a very poor prediction of the reaction energy barrier, the use of an intermediate snapshot of the former trajectory brings the score value above 0.40 with a low mean absolute error (ca. 3 kcal mol –1 ). Altogether, we have faced in this work some initial challenges of the final goal of getting an efficient workflow for the semiautomatic prediction of enzyme-catalyzed energy barriers and catalytic efficiencies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Combining Machine Learning and Computational Chemistry for Predictive Insights Into Chemical Systems
Keith, J. A., Vassilev-Galindo, V., Cheng, B., Chmiela, S., Gastegger, M., Müller, K.-R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00107 · Cited by 849
Self-citationDeep learning-based kcat prediction enables improved enzyme-constrained model reconstruction
Li, F., Yuan, L., Lu, H., Li, G., Chen, Y., Engqvist, M. K. M., Kerkhoven, E. J., & Nielsen, J. (2022) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-022-00798-z · Cited by 466
The BRENDA enzyme information system–From a database to an expert system
Schomburg, I., Jeske, L., Ulbrich, M., Placzek, S., Chang, A., & Schomburg, D. (2017) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.04.020 · Cited by 222
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 65
- 10.1016/S0958-1669(02)00328-2 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00203 · DOI
- 10.1021/jacs.5b07812 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.02.014 · DOI
- 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00172 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1039/C6RA16992A · DOI
- 10.1021/acsomega.9b04105 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.4997367 · DOI
- 10.1021/acscatal.9b01464 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.11.020 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cogsc.2017.06.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.08.033 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.06.012 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gky417 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1088172 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00399 · DOI
- 10.1021/jacs.7b02671 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.202427399 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0021-9991(77)90121-8 · DOI · Paper page
- de Alba Ortíz, A. P.; Vreede, J.; Ensing, B. Biomolecular Simulations: Methods and Protocols ; Bonomi, M.; Camilloni, C., Eds. Springer: New York, NY, 2019; pp 255–290.
- 10.1021/ja00540a008 · DOI
- 10.1021/jacs.8b13879 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsphyschemau.2c00005 · DOI
- 10.1080/01442350903495417 · DOI
- Schowen, R. L. Transition States of Biochemical Processes ; Gandour, R. D.; Schowen, R. L., Eds. Springer: Boston, MA, 1978; pp 77–114. · DOI
- 10.1063/1.1590311 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.1651473 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b01186 · DOI
- 10.1039/C9OB01315F · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-019-56612-7 · DOI
- 10.1002/wcms.1593 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-021-24525-7 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41557-021-00716-z · DOI
- 10.1021/acscatal.9b04321 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00877 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkx1065 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.184115 · DOI · Paper page
- Cristianini N., 2000, An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-Based Learning Methods, 10.1017/CBO9780511801389 · DOI · Paper page
- Drucker H., 1996, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 9, 155
- 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.3553717 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2006753117 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gks375 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00591 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.464913 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1139/p80-159 · DOI
- 10.1021/j100096a001 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.445869 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.470117 · DOI
- 10.1021/ct400341p · DOI
- 10.1021/ct100684s · DOI
- 10.1002/qua.24954 · DOI
- Buitinck, L.; Louppe, G.; Blondel, M.; Pedregosa, F.; Mueller, A.; Grisel, O.; Niculae, V.; Prettenhofer, P.; Gramfort, A.; Grobler, J.; Layton, R.; VanderPlas, J.; Joly, A.; Holt, B.; Varoquaux, G.In API Design for Machine Learning Software: Experiences from the scikit-learn Project , ECML PKDD Workshop: Languages for Data Mining and Machine Learning, 2013; pp 108–122.
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2019.106949 · DOI
- Wold, H. Multivariate Analysis – III ; Krishnaiah, P. R., Ed. Academic Press, 1973; pp 383–407. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.07.022 · DOI
- 10.1002/cbic.202000841 · DOI
- 10.1021/acscatal.1c02444 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-019-09326-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acscatal.9b05604 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00253-019-09717-y · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-022-04599-z · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.058301 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00876 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Platero-Rochart, D., Krivobokova, T., Gastegger, M., Reibnegger, G., & Sánchez-Murcia, P. A.
- Affiliations
- Medical University of Graz (AT)
- University of Vienna (AT)
- Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
- Laboratory of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Otto-Loewi Research Center, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstraße 6/III, A-8010 Graz, Austria
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2023-07-21
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 4623-4632
- ISSN
- 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-960X
- PMC
- PMC10430765
- OpenAlex
- W4384942549
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Otto-Loewi Research Center, Medical University of Graz
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Keywords
- enzyme catalysis, reaction barriers, MHETase, Ideonella sakaiensis, machine learning regression, reaction mechanism, chemical representation, protein engineering
- MeSH terms
- Catalysis, Hydrolases, Hydrolysis, Physics, Quantum Theory, Molecular Dynamics Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review