Cited by 15Machine Learning in Materials ScienceComputational Drug Discovery MethodsAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prediction of Enzyme Catalysis by Computing Reaction Energy Barriers via Steered QM/MM Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Machine Learning

Open access
Platero-Rochart, Daniel, Krivobokova, Tatyana, Gastegger, Michael, Reibnegger, Gilbert, Sánchez-Murcia, Pedro A.·2023·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The prediction of enzyme activity is one of the main challenges in catalysis. With computer-aided methods, it is possible to simulate the reaction mechanism at the atomic level. However, these methods are usually expensive if they are to be used on a large scale, as they are needed for protein engineering campaigns. To alleviate this situation, machine learning methods can help in the generation of predictive-decision models. Herein, we test different regression algorithms for the prediction of the reaction energy barrier of the rate-limiting step of the hydrolysis of mono-(2-hydroxyethyl)terephthalic acid by the MHETase of Ideonella sakaiensis . As a training data set, we use steered quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) molecular dynamics (MD) simulation snapshots and their corresponding pulling work values. We have explored three algorithms together with three chemical representations. As an outcome, our trained models are able to predict pulling works along the steered QM/MM MD simulations with a mean absolute error below 3 kcal mol –1 and a score value above 0.90. More challenging is the prediction of the energy maximum with a single geometry. Whereas the use of the initial snapshot of the QM/MM MD trajectory as input geometry yields a very poor prediction of the reaction energy barrier, the use of an intermediate snapshot of the former trajectory brings the score value above 0.40 with a low mean absolute error (ca. 3 kcal mol –1 ). Altogether, we have faced in this work some initial challenges of the final goal of getting an efficient workflow for the semiautomatic prediction of enzyme-catalyzed energy barriers and catalytic efficiencies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00772

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 65

  1. 10.1016/S0958-1669(02)00328-2 · DOI
  2. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00203 · DOI
  3. 10.1021/jacs.5b07812 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.02.014 · DOI
  5. 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00172 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1039/C6RA16992A · DOI
  7. 10.1021/acsomega.9b04105 · DOI
  8. 10.1063/1.4997367 · DOI
  9. 10.1021/acscatal.9b01464 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.11.020 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.cogsc.2017.06.002 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.08.033 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.06.012 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/nar/gky417 · DOI
  15. 10.1126/science.1088172 · DOI
  16. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00399 · DOI
  17. 10.1021/jacs.7b02671 · DOI
  18. 10.1073/pnas.202427399 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/0021-9991(77)90121-8 · DOI · Paper page
  20. de Alba Ortíz, A. P.; Vreede, J.; Ensing, B. Biomolecular Simulations: Methods and Protocols ; Bonomi, M.; Camilloni, C., Eds. Springer: New York, NY, 2019; pp 255–290.
  21. 10.1021/ja00540a008 · DOI
  22. 10.1021/jacs.8b13879 · DOI
  23. 10.1021/acsphyschemau.2c00005 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/01442350903495417 · DOI
  25. Schowen, R. L. Transition States of Biochemical Processes ; Gandour, R. D.; Schowen, R. L., Eds. Springer: Boston, MA, 1978; pp 77–114. · DOI
  26. 10.1063/1.1590311 · DOI
  27. 10.1063/1.1651473 · DOI
  28. 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b01186 · DOI
  29. 10.1039/C9OB01315F · DOI
  30. 10.1038/s41598-019-56612-7 · DOI
  31. 10.1002/wcms.1593 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/s41467-021-24525-7 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/s41557-021-00716-z · DOI
  34. 10.1021/acscatal.9b04321 · DOI
  35. 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00877 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/nar/gkx1065 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.184115 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Cristianini N., 2000, An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-Based Learning Methods, 10.1017/CBO9780511801389 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Drucker H., 1996, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 9, 155
  40. 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1063/1.3553717 · DOI
  42. 10.1073/pnas.2006753117 · DOI
  43. 10.1093/nar/gks375 · DOI
  44. 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00591 · DOI
  45. 10.1063/1.464913 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1139/p80-159 · DOI
  48. 10.1021/j100096a001 · DOI
  49. 10.1063/1.445869 · DOI
  50. 10.1063/1.470117 · DOI
  51. 10.1021/ct400341p · DOI
  52. 10.1021/ct100684s · DOI
  53. 10.1002/qua.24954 · DOI
  54. Buitinck, L.; Louppe, G.; Blondel, M.; Pedregosa, F.; Mueller, A.; Grisel, O.; Niculae, V.; Prettenhofer, P.; Gramfort, A.; Grobler, J.; Layton, R.; VanderPlas, J.; Joly, A.; Holt, B.; Varoquaux, G.In API Design for Machine Learning Software: Experiences from the scikit-learn Project , ECML PKDD Workshop: Languages for Data Mining and Machine Learning, 2013; pp 108–122.
  55. 10.1016/j.cpc.2019.106949 · DOI
  56. Wold, H. Multivariate Analysis – III ; Krishnaiah, P. R., Ed. Academic Press, 1973; pp 383–407. · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.07.022 · DOI
  58. 10.1002/cbic.202000841 · DOI
  59. 10.1021/acscatal.1c02444 · DOI
  60. 10.1038/s41467-019-09326-3 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1021/acscatal.9b05604 · DOI
  62. 10.1007/s00253-019-09717-y · DOI
  63. 10.1038/s41586-022-04599-z · DOI
  64. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.058301 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00876 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Platero-Rochart, D., Krivobokova, T., Gastegger, M., Reibnegger, G., & Sánchez-Murcia, P. A.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of Graz (AT)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
  • Laboratory of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Otto-Loewi Research Center, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstraße 6/III, A-8010 Graz, Austria
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2023-07-21
Volume
63
Issue
15
Pages
4623-4632
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W4384942549
Cited by
15
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Otto-Loewi Research Center, Medical University of Graz
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Keywords
enzyme catalysis, reaction barriers, MHETase, Ideonella sakaiensis, machine learning regression, reaction mechanism, chemical representation, protein engineering
MeSH terms
Catalysis, Hydrolases, Hydrolysis, Physics, Quantum Theory, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review