Cited by 7Computational Drug Discovery MethodsGene expression and cancer classificationMachine Learning in Materials Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Compound Activity Prediction with Dose-Dependent Transcriptomic Profiles and Deep Learning

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Predicting compound activity in assays is a long-standing challenge in drug discovery. Computational models based on compound-induced gene expression signatures from a single profiling assay have shown promise toward predicting compound activity in other, seemingly unrelated, assays. Applications of such models include predicting mechanisms-of-action (MoA) for phenotypic hits, identifying off-target activities, and identifying polypharmacologies. Here, we introduce transcriptomics-to-activity transformer (TAT) models that leverage gene expression profiles observed over compound treatment at multiple concentrations to predict the compound activity in other biochemical or cellular assays. We built TAT models based on gene expression data from a RASL-seq assay to predict the activity of 2692 compounds in 262 dose-response assays. We obtained useful models for 51% of the assays, as determined through a realistic held-out set. Prospectively, we experimentally validated the activity predictions of a TAT model in a malaria inhibition assay. With a 63% hit rate, TAT successfully identified several submicromolar malaria inhibitors. Our results thus demonstrate the potential of transcriptomic responses over compound concentration and the TAT modeling framework as a cost-efficient way to identify the bioactivities of promising compounds across many assays.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01855

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.2174/138161207782794257 · DOI
  2. 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00375 · DOI
  3. 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00250 · DOI
  4. 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00864 · DOI
  5. 10.1126/science.1132939 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1002/0471142727.mb0413s98 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.049 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1038/s41467-017-00136-z · DOI
  9. 10.1002/9781394167258.ch10 · DOI
  10. 10.3389/fchem.2020.00296 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/s41467-023-37570-1 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.12.014 · DOI
  13. 10.1186/gb-2008-9-6-r100 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/s42003-022-03763-5 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/s41592-022-01667-0 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.slasd.2022.12.003 · DOI
  17. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000512 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/s41598-020-66533-5 · DOI
  19. Vaswani A., 2017, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30
  20. Brown T., 2020, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877
  21. Wei J., 2022, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
  22. Yun S., 2019, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32
  23. Dosovitskiy A., 2021, International Conference on Learning Representations
  24. Alayrac J.-B., 2022, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
  25. 10.1021/acscentsci.9b00576 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/s41587-022-01618-2 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2020.07.004 · DOI
  28. 10.1101/580654 · DOI
  29. 10.1371/journal.pone.0150460 · DOI
  30. 10.1089/adt.2018.845 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/nmeth.2771 · DOI
  32. 10.3389/fgene.2019.00008 · DOI
  33. Hetzel L., 2022, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 26711
  34. 10.1089/adt.2016.715 · DOI
  35. Kingma D. P., 2015, 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015, Conference Track Proceedings
  36. Pedregosa F., 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 12, 2825
  37. 10.1145/2939672.2939785 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1126/science.781840 · DOI
  39. 10.1128/AAC.01607-06 · DOI
  40. 10.1177/2472555217752140 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv723 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Godinez, W. J., Trifonov, V., Fang, B., Kuzu, G., Pei, L., Guiguemde, W. A., Martin, E. J., King, F. J., Jenkins, J. L., & Skewes-Cox, P.
Affiliations
  • Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Emeryville, California 94608, United States
  • Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, San Diego, California 92121, United States
  • Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States
Corresponding author
Godinez, William J.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2024-01-31
Volume
64
Issue
7
Pages
2695-2704
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W4391389313
Cited by
7
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Novartis Repository (Novartis) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
Keywords
compound activity prediction, dose-dependent gene expression, gene expression signatures, dose-response assay, off-target effects, polypharmacology, mechanism of action, deep learning
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Humans, Malaria, Gene Expression Profiling, Drug Discovery, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review