Toward the Prediction of Binding Events in Very Flexible, Allosteric, Multidomain Proteins
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Knowledge of the structures formed by proteins and small molecules is key to understand the molecular principles of chemotherapy and for designing new and more effective drugs. During the early stage of a drug discovery program, it is customary to predict ligand-protein complexes in silico, particularly when screening large compound databases. While virtual screening based on molecular docking is widely used for this purpose, it generally fails in mimicking binding events associated with large conformational changes in the protein, particularly when the latter involve multiple domains. In this work, we describe a new methodology to generate bound-like conformations of very flexible and allosteric proteins bearing multiple binding sites by exploiting only information on the unbound structure and the putative binding sites. The protocol is validated on the paradigm enzyme adenylate kinase, for which we generated a significant fraction of bound-like structures. A fraction of these conformations, employed in ensemble-docking calculations, allowed to find native-like poses of substrates and inhibitors (binding to the active form of the enzyme), as well as catalytically incompetent analogs (binding the inactive form). Our protocol provides a general framework for the generation of bound-like conformations of challenging drug targets that are suitable to host different ligands, demonstrating high sensitivity to the fine chemical details that regulate protein's activity. We foresee applications in virtual screening, in the prediction of the impact of amino acid mutations on structure and dynamics, and in protein engineering.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861 · see citing works
Multiple diverse ligands binding at a single protein site: A matter of pre‐existing populations
Ma, B., Shatsky, M., Wolfson, H. J., & Nussinov, R. (2002) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.21302 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Impact of protein conformational diversity on AlphaFold predictions
Saldaño, T., Escobedo, N., Marchetti, J., Zea, D. J., Mac Donagh, J., Velez Rueda, A. J., Gonik, E., Melani, A. G., Novomisky Nechcoff, J., Salas, M. N., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.27.466189 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Basciu, A., Athar, M., Kurt, H., Neville, C., Malloci, G., Muredda, F. C., Bosin, A., Ruggerone, P., Bonvin, A. M. J. J., & Vargiu, A. V.
- Affiliations
- University of Cagliari (IT)
- Temple University (US)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Basciu, Andrea
- Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J.
- Vargiu, Attilio V.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2025-02-05
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2052-2065
- ISSN
- 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-960X
- PMC
- PMC11863385
- OpenAlex
- W4407157330
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5
- FWCI
- 3.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (R01AI136799)
- H2020 Research Infrastructures (823830)
- NextGenerationEU (ECS0000038, PE00000007, PE00000019)
- Programma Operativo Nazionale Ricerca e Competitivit? (Azione I.1 Dottorati Innovativi con caratterizz, PROOF of CONCEPT - Valorizzazione dei risultati)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- allosteric proteins, multidomain proteins, protein flexibility, ensemble docking, adenylate kinase, virtual screening, conformational change, enzyme inhibitors, protein engineering, amino acid mutations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review