Cited by 30Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Structure and Dynamics

ProAffinity-GNN: A Novel Approach to Structure-Based Protein–Protein Binding Affinity Prediction via a Curated Data Set and Graph Neural Networks

Open access
Zhou, Zhiyuan, Yin, Yueming, Han, Hao, Jia, Yiping, Koh, Jun Hong, Kong, Adams Wai-Kin, Mu, Yuguang·2024·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are crucial for understanding biological processes and disease mechanisms, contributing significantly to advances in protein engineering and drug discovery. The accurate determination of binding affinities, essential for decoding PPIs, faces challenges due to the substantial time and financial costs involved in experimental and theoretical methods. This situation underscores the urgent need for more effective and precise methodologies for predicting binding affinity. Despite the abundance of research on PPI modeling, the field of quantitative binding affinity prediction remains underexplored, mainly due to a lack of comprehensive data. This study seeks to address these needs by manually curating pairwise interaction labels on available 3D structures of protein complexes, with experimentally determined binding affinities, creating the largest data set for structure-based pairwise protein interaction with binding affinity to date. Subsequently, we introduce ProAffinity-GNN, a novel deep learning framework using protein language model and graph neural network (GNN) to improve the accuracy of prediction of structure-based protein-protein binding affinities. The evaluation results across several benchmark test sets and an additional case study demonstrate that ProAffinity-GNN not only outperforms existing models in terms of accuracy but also shows strong generalization capabilities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01850

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Zhou, Z., Yin, Y., Han, H., Jia, Y., Koh, J. H., Kong, A. W.-K., & Mu, Y.
Affiliations
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Kong, Adams Wai-Kin
  • Mu, Yuguang
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2024-11-19
Volume
64
Issue
23
Pages
8796-8808
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W4404505690
Cited by
30
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 12
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education - Singapore (RG97/22)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
protein-protein interaction, graph neural networks, protein language models
MeSH terms
Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Neural Networks, Computer, Protein Interaction Mapping, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review