Cited by 9Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsEnzyme Structure and Function

AF3Score: A Score-Only Adaptation of AlphaFold3 for Biomolecular Structure Evaluation

Open access
Liu, Yu, Yu, Qilin, Wang, Di, Chen, Mingchen·2025·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Scoring biomolecular complexes remains central to structural modeling efforts. Recent studies suggest that AlphaFold (AF) - a revolutionary deep learning model for biomolecular structure prediction - has implicitly learned an approximate biophysical energy function. While many researchers highly rely on AF-derived scores for structure evaluation, existing AlphaFold2-based implementations require iterative refinement of the input structure, leading to biased scoring. To address this limitation, we adapted AlphaFold3 into a score-only model, AF3Score, by directly feeding input coordinates into the confidence head while bypassing the diffusion-based structure module. AF3Score demonstrates robust performance in structural quality assessment across diverse systems, including monomeric proteins, protein-protein complexes, de novo designed binders, fold-switching proteins, and protein-ligand complexes. In benchmarking designed binder screening, AF3Score outperformed state-of-the-art methods for 8 out of 10 targets. Moreover, combining AF3Score with AlphaFold2-derived methods significantly improved the enrichment of experimentally validated binders, increasing the success rate from 15.2 to 31.6%. Additionally, AF3Score effectively identified stable conformations in fold-switching proteins, whereas AlphaFold predominantly predicted only the dominant fold. These findings highlight the broad applicability of AF3Score, from high-throughput screening in de novo binder design to filtering docking-generated poses and molecular dynamics (MD) trajectories.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jcim.5c00653

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Liu, Y., Yu, Q., Wang, D., & Chen, M.
Affiliations
Changping Laboratory (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Mingchen
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2025-07-17
Volume
65
Issue
15
Pages
8207-8214
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W4412489171
Cited by
9
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 1
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Changping Laboratory
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
AlphaFold3, structural quality assessment, protein-protein complex, protein-ligand complex, protein stability
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Ligands, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Protein Folding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review