AF3Score: A Score-Only Adaptation of AlphaFold3 for Biomolecular Structure Evaluation
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Scoring biomolecular complexes remains central to structural modeling efforts. Recent studies suggest that AlphaFold (AF) - a revolutionary deep learning model for biomolecular structure prediction - has implicitly learned an approximate biophysical energy function. While many researchers highly rely on AF-derived scores for structure evaluation, existing AlphaFold2-based implementations require iterative refinement of the input structure, leading to biased scoring. To address this limitation, we adapted AlphaFold3 into a score-only model, AF3Score, by directly feeding input coordinates into the confidence head while bypassing the diffusion-based structure module. AF3Score demonstrates robust performance in structural quality assessment across diverse systems, including monomeric proteins, protein-protein complexes, de novo designed binders, fold-switching proteins, and protein-ligand complexes. In benchmarking designed binder screening, AF3Score outperformed state-of-the-art methods for 8 out of 10 targets. Moreover, combining AF3Score with AlphaFold2-derived methods significantly improved the enrichment of experimentally validated binders, increasing the success rate from 15.2 to 31.6%. Additionally, AF3Score effectively identified stable conformations in fold-switching proteins, whereas AlphaFold predominantly predicted only the dominant fold. These findings highlight the broad applicability of AF3Score, from high-throughput screening in de novo binder design to filtering docking-generated poses and molecular dynamics (MD) trajectories.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861 · see citing works
Watson, J. L., Juergens, D., Bennett, N. R., Trippe, B. L., Yim, J., Eisenach, H. E., Ahern, W., Borst, A. J., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.12.09.519842 · Cited by 2,369 · see citing works
De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion
Watson, J. L., Juergens, D., Bennett, N. R., Trippe, B. L., Yim, J., Eisenach, H. E., Ahern, W., Borst, A. J., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8 · Cited by 2,325 · see citing works
Predicting multiple conformations via sequence clustering and AlphaFold2
Wayment-Steele, H. K., Ojoawo, A., Otten, R., Apitz, J. M., Pitsawong, W., Hömberger, M., Ovchinnikov, S., Colwell, L., & Kern, D. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06832-9 · Cited by 545 · see citing works
Vreven, T., Moal, I. H., Vangone, A., Pierce, B. G., Kastritis, P. L., Torchala, M., Chaleil, R., Jiménez-García, B., Bates, P. A., Fernandez-Recio, J., et al. (2015) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2015.07.016 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
SPEACH_AF: Sampling protein ensembles and conformational heterogeneity with Alphafold2
Stein, R. A., & Mchaourab, H. S. (2022) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010483 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Liu, Y., Yu, Q., Wang, D., & Chen, M.
- Affiliations
- Changping Laboratory (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Mingchen
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2025-07-17
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 8207-8214
- ISSN
- 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-960X
- OpenAlex
- W4412489171
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 2.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Changping Laboratory
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- AlphaFold3, structural quality assessment, protein-protein complex, protein-ligand complex, protein stability
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Ligands, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Protein Folding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review