The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Design Space Exploration and Machine Learning Prediction of Hydrofluorocarbon Solubility in Ionic Liquids for Refrigerant Separation
Open accessAbstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Ionic liquids (ILs) are promising solvents for the separation of hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) mixtures due to their tunable solvation properties and negligible vapor pressure. We present a computational study of R -32 and R -125 solubility in over 341,000 ILs. These HFCs are widely used in refrigerant mixtures such as R -410A (50/50 wt % R -32 and R -125). Using COSMO-RS based molecular simulation, we compute infinite-dilution activity coefficients that reveal a broad spectrum of solubility and selectivity across IL families. Dimensionality reduction techniques, such as PCA and t-SNE, uncover distinct regions in IL design space with varying potential for HFC absorption. While traditional IL selection for R -410A separation primarily depends on R -32 selective ILs, our analysis reveals many R -125 selective ILs. Building on thermodynamic insights, we also propose a new geometric measure for rapid screening of ILs as solvents for R -410A separation. Furthermore, we develop machine learning (ML) models that accurately predict infinite dilution activity coefficients of R -32 and R -125 in ILs. We develop a binary classifier to further distinguish R -32- vs R -125-selective ILs with over 95% precision and recall. These models provide rapid prediction of infinite dilution activity coefficients, thereby facilitating the identification and design of promising ILs for refrigerant separation involving R -32 and R -125, and are available at https://github.com/aiftakher/HFC-IL-ActivityCoefficient .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 7
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2025.109138 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-443-28824-1.50218-0 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.adp7414 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c00136 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c00937 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119363 · DOI
- 10.1021/je050386z · DOI
- 10.1002/aic.690471102 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fluid.2021.113210 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.est.2c00051 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jct.2017.04.009 · DOI
- 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c06252 · DOI
- 10.1002/aic.10685 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117386 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00276 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.124610 · DOI
- 10.1007/s100980050036 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117136 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c02820 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108890 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-323-85159-6.50110-X · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00130 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b03150 · DOI
- 10.1515/cpe-2017-0003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fluid.2010.02.002 · DOI
- 10.1021/j100007a062 · DOI
- 10.1021/jp980017s · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0169-7439(87)80084-9 · DOI
- Maaten L. V. D., 2008, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 9, 2579
- 10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhang Z., 2018, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 31
- 10.1002/aic.690210607 · DOI
- 10.1002/aic.690401011 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c02891 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.115387 · DOI
- 10.1039/D2CC01549H · DOI
- 10.1007/s10115-013-0679-x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/cite.202200172 · DOI
- 10.48550/arXiv.2507.08124 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Iftakher, A., & Hasan, M. M. F.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hasan, M. M. Faruque
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2025-08-25
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 12168-12178
- ISSN
- 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-960X
- OpenAlex
- W4413488385
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 2.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (84097201)
- West Texas A and M University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Ionic liquids properties and applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Keywords
- ionic liquids, refrigerant separation, R32, R125, R410A, infinite dilution activity coefficients, COSMO-RS, design space exploration, dimensionality reduction, machine learning prediction
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Fluorocarbons, Solubility, Solvents, Thermodynamics, Ionic Liquids
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review