Cited by 7Ionic liquids properties and applicationsPhase Equilibria and ThermodynamicsMachine Learning in Materials Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Design Space Exploration and Machine Learning Prediction of Hydrofluorocarbon Solubility in Ionic Liquids for Refrigerant Separation

Open access
Iftakher, Ashfaq, Hasan, M. M. Faruque·2025·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Ionic liquids (ILs) are promising solvents for the separation of hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) mixtures due to their tunable solvation properties and negligible vapor pressure. We present a computational study of R -32 and R -125 solubility in over 341,000 ILs. These HFCs are widely used in refrigerant mixtures such as R -410A (50/50 wt % R -32 and R -125). Using COSMO-RS based molecular simulation, we compute infinite-dilution activity coefficients that reveal a broad spectrum of solubility and selectivity across IL families. Dimensionality reduction techniques, such as PCA and t-SNE, uncover distinct regions in IL design space with varying potential for HFC absorption. While traditional IL selection for R -410A separation primarily depends on R -32 selective ILs, our analysis reveals many R -125 selective ILs. Building on thermodynamic insights, we also propose a new geometric measure for rapid screening of ILs as solvents for R -410A separation. Furthermore, we develop machine learning (ML) models that accurately predict infinite dilution activity coefficients of R -32 and R -125 in ILs. We develop a binary classifier to further distinguish R -32- vs R -125-selective ILs with over 95% precision and recall. These models provide rapid prediction of infinite dilution activity coefficients, thereby facilitating the identification and design of promising ILs for refrigerant separation involving R -32 and R -125, and are available at https://github.com/aiftakher/HFC-IL-ActivityCoefficient .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jcim.5c01216

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 7

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2025.109138 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/B978-0-443-28824-1.50218-0 · DOI
  3. 10.1126/sciadv.adp7414 · DOI
  4. 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c00136 · DOI
  5. 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c00937 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119363 · DOI
  7. 10.1021/je050386z · DOI
  8. 10.1002/aic.690471102 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.fluid.2021.113210 · DOI
  10. 10.1021/acs.est.2c00051 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.jct.2017.04.009 · DOI
  12. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c06252 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/aic.10685 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117386 · DOI
  15. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00276 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.124610 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s100980050036 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117136 · DOI
  19. 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c02820 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108890 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/B978-0-323-85159-6.50110-X · DOI
  22. 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00130 · DOI
  23. 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b03150 · DOI
  24. 10.1515/cpe-2017-0003 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.fluid.2010.02.002 · DOI
  26. 10.1021/j100007a062 · DOI
  27. 10.1021/jp980017s · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/0169-7439(87)80084-9 · DOI
  29. Maaten L. V. D., 2008, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 9, 2579
  30. 10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Zhang Z., 2018, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 31
  32. 10.1002/aic.690210607 · DOI
  33. 10.1002/aic.690401011 · DOI
  34. 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c02891 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.115387 · DOI
  36. 10.1039/D2CC01549H · DOI
  37. 10.1007/s10115-013-0679-x · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1002/cite.202200172 · DOI
  39. 10.48550/arXiv.2507.08124 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Iftakher, A., & Hasan, M. M. F.
Affiliations
Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Hasan, M. M. Faruque
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2025-08-25
Volume
65
Issue
22
Pages
12168-12178
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W4413488385
Cited by
7
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (84097201)
  • West Texas A and M University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Ionic liquids properties and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
Keywords
ionic liquids, refrigerant separation, R32, R125, R410A, infinite dilution activity coefficients, COSMO-RS, design space exploration, dimensionality reduction, machine learning prediction
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Fluorocarbons, Solubility, Solvents, Thermodynamics, Ionic Liquids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review