Cited by 45Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and DynamicsReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Induced-Fit Docking Enables Accurate Free Energy Perturbation Calculations in Homology Models

Open access
Xu, Tianchuan, Zhu, Kai, Beautrait, Alexandre, Vendome, Jeremie, Borrelli, Kenneth W., Abel, Robert, Friesner, Richard A., Miller, Edward B.·2022·Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Homology models have been used for virtual screening and to understand the binding mode of a known active compound; however, rarely have the models been shown to be of sufficient accuracy, comparable to crystal structures, to support free-energy perturbation (FEP) calculations. We demonstrate here that the use of an advanced induced-fit docking methodology reliably enables predictive FEP calculations on congeneric series across homology models ≥30% sequence identity. Furthermore, we show that retrospective FEP calculations on a congeneric series of drug-like ligands are sufficient to discriminate between predicted binding modes. Results are presented for a total of 29 homology models for 14 protein targets, showing FEP results comparable to those obtained using experimentally determined crystal structures for 86% of homology models with template structure sequence identities ranging from 30 to 50%. Implications for the use and validation of homology models in drug discovery projects are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00371

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, T., Zhu, K., Beautrait, A., Vendome, J., Borrelli, K. W., Abel, R., Friesner, R. A., & Miller, E. B.
Affiliations
  • Schrodinger (United States) (US)
  • Schrödinger, Inc., 1540 Broadway, New York, New York 10036, United States
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, Edward B.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2022-08-16
Volume
18
Issue
9
Pages
5710-5724
ISSN
  • 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-9626
OpenAlex
W4293064187
Cited by
45
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2
FWCI
4.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (publishedVersion)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
homology model, induced fit docking, free energy perturbation, binding free energy, congeneric series, ligand binding modes, protein-ligand binding, drug discovery, model validation
MeSH terms
Ligands, Protein Binding, Retrospective Studies, Entropy, Drug Discovery, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review