Markov State Models with Weighted Ensemble Simulation: How to Eliminate the Trajectory Merging Bias
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The weighted ensemble (WE) algorithm is gaining popularity as a rare event method for studying long timescale processes with molecular dynamics. WE is particularly useful for determining kinetic properties, such as rates of protein (un)folding and ligand (un)binding, where transition rates can be calculated from the flux of trajectories into a target basin of interest. However, this flux depends exponentially on the number of splitting events that a given trajectory experiences before reaching the target state and can vary by orders of magnitude between WE replicates. Markov state models (MSMs) are helpful tools to aggregate information across multiple WE simulations and have previously been shown to provide more accurate transition rates than WE alone. Discrete-time MSMs are models that coarsely describe the evolution of the system from one discrete state to the next using a discrete lag time, τ. When an MSM is built using conventional MD data, longer values of τ typically provide more accurate results. Combining WE simulations with Markov state modeling presents some additional challenges, especially when using a value of τ that exceeds the lag time between resampling steps in the WE algorithm, τ WE . Here, we identify a source of bias that occurs when τ > τ WE, which we refer to as “merging bias”. We also propose an algorithm to eliminate the merging bias, which results in merging bias-corrected MSMs, or “MBC-MSMs”. Using a simple model system, as well as a complex biomolecular example, we show that MBC-MSMs significantly outperform both τ = τ WE MSMs and uncorrected MSMs at longer lag times.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Markov state models of biomolecular conformational dynamics
Chodera, J. D., & Noé, F. (2014) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2014.04.002 · Cited by 776 · see citing works
Machine learning approaches for analyzing and enhancing molecular dynamics simulations
Wang, Y., Lamim Ribeiro, J. M., & Tiwary, P. (2020) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2019.12.016 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Suárez, E., Wiewiora, R. P., Wehmeyer, C., Noé, F., Chodera, J. D., & Zuckerman, D. M. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01154 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Bose, S., Kilinc, C., & Dickson, A.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
- Corresponding author
- Dickson, Alex
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2025-02-11
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1805-1816
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- PMC
- PMC11866749
- OpenAlex
- W4407368565
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (5R01AG080186-02, 5R01GM130794-07)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Model Reduction and Neural Networks
- Keywords
- Markov state models, bias correction, transition rates, time delay, protein folding, ligand binding, molecular dynamics
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Kinetics, Ligands, Markov Chains, Proteins, Protein Folding, Molecular Dynamics Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review