Cited by 10Protein Structure and DynamicsAdvanced Physical and Chemical Molecular InteractionsModel Reduction and Neural Networks

Markov State Models with Weighted Ensemble Simulation: How to Eliminate the Trajectory Merging Bias

Open access
Bose, Samik, Kilinc, Ceren, Dickson, Alex·2025·Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The weighted ensemble (WE) algorithm is gaining popularity as a rare event method for studying long timescale processes with molecular dynamics. WE is particularly useful for determining kinetic properties, such as rates of protein (un)folding and ligand (un)binding, where transition rates can be calculated from the flux of trajectories into a target basin of interest. However, this flux depends exponentially on the number of splitting events that a given trajectory experiences before reaching the target state and can vary by orders of magnitude between WE replicates. Markov state models (MSMs) are helpful tools to aggregate information across multiple WE simulations and have previously been shown to provide more accurate transition rates than WE alone. Discrete-time MSMs are models that coarsely describe the evolution of the system from one discrete state to the next using a discrete lag time, τ. When an MSM is built using conventional MD data, longer values of τ typically provide more accurate results. Combining WE simulations with Markov state modeling presents some additional challenges, especially when using a value of τ that exceeds the lag time between resampling steps in the WE algorithm, τ WE . Here, we identify a source of bias that occurs when τ > τ WE, which we refer to as “merging bias”. We also propose an algorithm to eliminate the merging bias, which results in merging bias-corrected MSMs, or “MBC-MSMs”. Using a simple model system, as well as a complex biomolecular example, we show that MBC-MSMs significantly outperform both τ = τ WE MSMs and uncorrected MSMs at longer lag times.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01141

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Bose, S., Kilinc, C., & Dickson, A.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Corresponding author
Dickson, Alex
Venue
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2025-02-11
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
1805-1816
ISSN
  • 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-9626
OpenAlex
W4407368565
Cited by
10
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 2
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (5R01AG080186-02, 5R01GM130794-07)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Keywords
Markov state models, bias correction, transition rates, time delay, protein folding, ligand binding, molecular dynamics
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Kinetics, Ligands, Markov Chains, Proteins, Protein Folding, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review