BioStructNet: Structure-Based Network with Transfer Learning for Predicting Biocatalyst Functions
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Enzyme-substrate interactions are essential to both biological processes and industrial applications. Advanced machine learning techniques have significantly accelerated biocatalysis research, revolutionizing the prediction of biocatalytic activities and facilitating the discovery of novel biocatalysts. However, the limited availability of data for specific enzyme functions, such as conversion efficiency and stereoselectivity, presents challenges for prediction accuracy. In this study, we developed BioStructNet, a structure-based deep learning network that integrates both protein and ligand structural data to capture the complexity of enzyme-substrate interactions. Benchmarking studies with different algorithms showed the enhanced predictive accuracy of BioStructNet. To further optimize the prediction accuracy for the small data set, we implemented transfer learning in the framework, training a source model on a large data set and fine-tuning it on a small, function-specific data set, using the CalB data set as a case study. The model performance was validated by comparing the attention heat maps generated by the BioStructNet interaction module with the enzyme-substrate interactions revealed from molecular dynamics simulations of enzyme-substrate complexes. BioStructNet would accelerate the discovery of functional enzymes for industrial use, particularly in cases where the training data sets for machine learning are small.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models
Hu, E. J., Shen, Y., Wallis, P., Allen-Zhu, Z., Li, Y., Wang, S., Wang, L., & Chen, W. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.09685 · Cited by 2,523 · see citing works
Accurate De Novo Prediction of Protein Contact Map by Ultra-Deep Learning Model
Wang, S., Sun, S., Li, Z., Zhang, R., & Xu, J. (2017) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005324 · Cited by 931 · see citing works
Evaluating Protein Transfer Learning with TAPE
Rao, R., Bhattacharya, N., Thomas, N., Duan, Y., Chen, X., Canny, J., Abbeel, P., & Song, Y. S. (2019) · doi:10.1101/676825 · Cited by 719 · see citing works
Modeling the language of life – Deep Learning Protein Sequences
Heinzinger, M., Elnaggar, A., Wang, Y., Dallago, C., Nechaev, D., Matthes, F., & Rost, B. (2019) · doi:10.1101/614313 · Cited by 606 · see citing works
Deep learning-based kcat prediction enables improved enzyme-constrained model reconstruction
Li, F., Yuan, L., Lu, H., Li, G., Chen, Y., Engqvist, M. K. M., Kerkhoven, E. J., & Nielsen, J. (2022) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-022-00798-z · Cited by 466 · see citing works
The BRENDA enzyme information system–From a database to an expert system
Schomburg, I., Jeske, L., Ulbrich, M., Placzek, S., Chang, A., & Schomburg, D. (2017) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.04.020 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Wang, X., Zhou, J., Mueller, J., Quinn, D., Carvalho, A., Moody, T. S., & Huang, M.
- Affiliations
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- Almac (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Huang, Meilan
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2024-12-20
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 474-490
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- PMC
- PMC11736791
- OpenAlex
- W4405637025
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 0.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Research Councils UK (EP/T022175)
- Invest Northern Ireland
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
- Keywords
- substrate binding, transfer learning, stereoselectivity, conversion efficiency, limited training data, attention heatmaps, molecular dynamics simulation, industrial enzymes
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Algorithms, Enzymes, Ligands, Biocatalysis, Molecular Dynamics Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review