Cited by 11Protein Structure and DynamicsAdvanced Physical and Chemical Molecular InteractionsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MSBack: Multiscale Backmapping of Highly Coarse-Grained Proteins Using Constrained Diffusion

Open access
Waltmann, Curt, Wang, Yihang, Yang, Chengxi, Kim, Siyoung, Voth, Gregory A.·2025·Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Coarse-grained (CG) molecular dynamics is a powerful tool for simulating the collective behavior of biomolecules. However, the structural information lost during coarse-graining prevents the CG configurations from being more widely useful (e.g., for ligand binding). Regenerating the lost all-atom coordinates, or backmapping, is an unmet challenge for protein CG at resolutions lower than one coarse-grain site or bead per amino acid residue. This low resolution is computationally necessary to simulate many protein complexes including viruses like SARS-CoV-2 and HIV-1. We propose MSBack, a method to backmap highly CG proteins using a diffusion model for the all-atom coordinates constrained to fit the CG coordinates. This diffusion process works by perturbing a known all-atom structure and does not require retraining. We show that this stochastically generates a distribution of α-carbon traces that match the CG coordinates. By combining this with physics-based methods for smaller-length backmapping, we fully backmap a mature HIV-1 capsid bound with the small molecule inositol hexakisphosphate at 1 Å resolution.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00459

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.011 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/s43588-021-00060-9 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2023.130534 · DOI
  4. 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00643 · DOI
  5. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c08731 · DOI
  6. 10.1073/pnas.2313737121 · DOI
  7. 10.1126/sciadv.add7434 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.06.025 · DOI
  9. 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01033 · DOI
  10. 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00905 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.08.007 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/978-94-017-9245-5_4 · DOI
  13. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c08198 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/jcc.26070 · DOI
  15. 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c01053 · DOI
  16. 10.1063/1.4929836 · DOI
  17. 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b01081 · DOI
  18. 10.1021/ct500834t · DOI
  19. 10.1021/ct4000444 · DOI
  20. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c05593 · DOI
  21. 10.1073/pnas.2117781119 · DOI
  22. 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00690 · DOI
  23. 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01438 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/s42256-024-00837-3 · DOI
  25. 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00840 · DOI
  26. 10.1021/acs.jpca.2c07716 · DOI
  27. Jones M., 2024, Flowback: A Flow-matching Approach for the Generative Backmapping of Macromolecules
  28. 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01870 · DOI
  29. 10.1063/5.0012320 · DOI
  30. 10.1063/5.0141888 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/s41594-022-00887-4 · DOI
  32. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c04473 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/ncomms11568 · DOI
  34. 10.1063/1.2938860 · DOI
  35. 10.1063/1.2938857 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/0304-4149(82)90051-5 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.48550/arXiv.2310.01768 · DOI
  38. 10.48550/arXiv.2209.14687 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.7554/eLife.81702 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1038/s41467-022-32019-3 · DOI
  42. 10.1529/biophysj.108.139733 · DOI
  43. 10.3390/v10110640 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/s41586-018-0396-4 · DOI
  45. 10.1021/ci300363c · DOI
  46. 10.1021/ci3003649 · DOI
  47. 10.1126/sciadv.abc6465 · DOI
  48. 10.1101/2024.10.04.616517 · DOI
  49. 10.1101/2025.01.19.633818 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.cell.2024.12.008 · DOI
  51. 10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1016/j.cplett.2006.07.086 · DOI
  53. 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00935 · DOI
  55. 10.1002/jcc.20945 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1002/jcc.21287 · DOI
  57. 10.1063/1.445869 · DOI
  58. 10.1038/nmeth.4067 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Waltmann, C., Wang, Y., Yang, C., Kim, S., & Voth, G. A.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Voth, Gregory A.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2025-06-02
Volume
21
Issue
12
Pages
6184-6193
ISSN
  • 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-9626
OpenAlex
W4410940969
Cited by
11
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 3
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (F32AI186429, R01AI178850, U54AI170855)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
restricted diffusion, diffusion models, HIV-1 capsid, phytic acid, protein complexes, SARS-CoV-2, ligand binding
MeSH terms
SARS-CoV-2, Capsid, Diffusion, Protein Conformation, Proteins, HIV-1, Capsid Proteins, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review