The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comprehensive Thermochemical Benchmark Set of Realistic Closed-Shell Metal Organic Reactions
Abstract
We introduce the new MOR41 benchmark set consisting of 41 closed-shell organometallic reactions resembling many important chemical transformations commonly used in transition metal chemistry and catalysis. It includes significantly larger molecules than presented in other transition metal test sets and covers a broad range of bonding motifs. Recent progress in linear-scaling coupled cluster theory allowed for the calculation of accurate DLPNO-CCSD(T)/CBS(def2-TZVPP/def2-QZVPP) reference energies for 3d,4d,5d-transition metal compounds with up to 120 atoms. Furthermore, 41 density functionals, including seven GGAs, three meta-GGAs, 14 hybrid functionals, and 17 double-hybrid functionals combined with two different London dispersion corrections, are benchmarked with respect to their performance for the newly compiled MOR41 reaction energies. A few wave function-based post-HF methods as, e.g., MP2 or RPA with similar computational demands are also tested and in total, 90 methods were considered. The double-hybrid functional PWPB95-D3(BJ) outperformed all other assessed methods with an MAD of 1.9 kcal/mol, followed by the hybrids ωB97X-V (2.2 kcal/mol) and mPW1B95-D3(BJ) (2.4 kcal/mol). The popular PBE0-D3(BJ) hybrid also performs well (2.8 kcal/mol). Within the meta-GGA class, the recently published SCAN-D3(BJ) functional as well as TPSS-D3(BJ) perform best (MAD of 3.2 and 3.3 kcal/mol, respectively). Many popular methods like BP86-D3(BJ) (4.9 kcal/mol) or B3LYP-D3(BJ) (4.9 kcal/mol) provide significantly worse reaction energies and are not recommended for organometallic thermochemistry considering the availability of better methods with the same computational cost. The results regarding the performance of different functional approximations are consistent with conclusions from previous main-group thermochemistry benchmark studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464913 · Cited by 103,767
Lee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R. G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 · Cited by 100,874
Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory
Grimme, S., Ehrlich, S., & Goerigk, L. (2011) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21759 · Cited by 28,221
Self-citationA new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464304 · Cited by 16,515
A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of "Hidden" Variables. I
Bohm, D. (1952) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.85.166 · Cited by 5,510
Cited by
Best‐Practice DFT Protocols for Basic Molecular Computational Chemistry**
Bursch, M., Mewes, J., Hansen, A., & Grimme, S. (2022) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202205735 · Cited by 890
Self-citationAn improved chain of spheres for exchange algorithm
Helmich-Paris, B., de Souza, B., Neese, F., & Izsák, R. (2021) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0058766 · Cited by 573
Santra, G., Sylvetsky, N., & Martin, J. M. L. (2019) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.9b03157 · Cited by 517
Status and Challenges of Density Functional Theory
Verma, P., & Truhlar, D. G. (2020) · Trends in Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trechm.2020.02.005 · Cited by 429
Nandy, A., Duan, C., Taylor, M. G., Liu, F., Steeves, A. H., & Kulik, H. J. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00347 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Dohm, S., Hansen, A., Steinmetz, M., Grimme, S., & Checinski, M. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-03-22
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2596-2608
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W2790580607
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 14.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comprehensive Thermochemical Benchmark Set of Realistic Closed-Shell Metal Organic Reactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01183
- The paper
- Dohm, S., Hansen, A., Steinmetz, M., Grimme, S., & Checinski, M. P. (2018). Comprehensive Thermochemical Benchmark Set of Realistic Closed-Shell Metal Organic Reactions. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01183
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.