Cited by 19Chemical Synthesis and AnalysisBiochemical and Structural Characterizationvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Structure–Activity Analysis of Cyclic Multicomponent Lipopeptide Self-Adjuvanting Vaccine Candidates Presenting Group A Streptococcus Antigens

Abstract

(GAS) infection causes a range of life-threatening diseases, including rheumatic heart disease. Cyclic peptides offer an attractive solution for presentation of short peptide antigens due to their stability and structurally constrained conformation. We investigated a cyclic carrier decapeptide incorporating a B cell GAS peptide epitope, a universal T helper epitope, and a synthetic toll-like receptor 2-targeting moiety as a possible self-adjuvanting GAS vaccine. A structure-activity relationship of the cyclic lipopeptide vaccine showed successful induction of J8-specific systemic immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies when administered subcutaneously without an additional adjuvant. Interestingly, the physical mixture control induced the highest titers of all vaccine compounds, with antibodies from mice immunized with this physical mixture control shown to effectively opsonize multiple strains of clinically isolated GAS bacteria. This study showed the capability for a self-adjuvanting cyclic delivery system to act as a vehicle for the delivery of GAS peptide antigens to treat GAS infections.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00203

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 19

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1086/521263 · DOI
  2. 10.1056/NEJMoa1603693 · DOI
  3. 10.5694/mja16.00400 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/cid/ciy1143 · DOI
  5. Kaplan M. H., 1963, J. Immunol., 90, 595, 10.4049/jimmunol.90.4.595 · DOI
  6. 10.1001/jama.1969.03150190037007 · DOI
  7. 10.3390/vaccines7030058 · DOI
  8. 10.1039/C5SC03892H · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00318 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.bmc.2016.03.063 · DOI
  11. 10.1371/journal.pone.0198658 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/infdis/jis107 · DOI
  13. 10.1039/C2CS35413F · DOI
  14. 10.1002/cmdc.200700315 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/0040-4039(94)02481-P · DOI
  16. 10.1039/C7BM00072C · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0022-1759(92)90033-P · DOI
  18. 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00572 · DOI
  19. Galanos C., 1975, Z. Immunitatsforsch. Exp. Klin. Immunol., 149, 214
  20. 10.3390/genes9110557 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.peptides.2012.08.021 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.04.028 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/psc.3021 · DOI
  24. Ahmad Fuaad A. A. H., 2016, Vaccine Design: Methods and Protocols: Volume 1: Vaccines for Human Diseases, 1403, 639, 10.1007/978-1-4939-3387-7_36 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/cbic.200700070 · DOI
  26. 10.1371/journal.pone.0046870 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/infdis/jiz528 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.046 · DOI
  29. Waleed M. H., 2017, Curr. Drug Delivery, 14, 935
  30. 10.3390/M566 · DOI
  31. 10.1371/journal.pone.0030146 · DOI
  32. 10.1021/ol049905y · DOI
  33. 10.1016/S0952-7915(96)80124-5 · DOI
  34. 10.2217/nnm.14.187 · DOI
  35. 10.1086/505146 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2016.11.002 · DOI
  37. 10.1021/ol3007925 · DOI
  38. 10.2217/nnm-2016-0291 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Madge, H. Y. R., Sharma, H., Hussein, W. M., Khalil, Z. G., Capon, R. J., Toth, I., & Stephenson, R. J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia
Corresponding author
Stephenson, Rachel J.
Venue
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Published
2020-04-29
Volume
63
Issue
10
Pages
5387-5397
ISSN
  • 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4804
OpenAlex
W3020711697
Cited by
19
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1132975)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
Streptococcus pyogenes, cyclic lipopeptides, self-adjuvanting vaccine, structure-activity relationship, B-cell epitopes, T-helper epitopes, opsonization, rheumatic heart disease, IgG, cyclic peptides
MeSH terms
Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Antigens, Bacterial, Bacterial Vaccines, Female, Humans, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Streptococcal Infections, Streptococcus pyogenes, Structure-Activity Relationship, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Mice, Lipopeptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review