Cited by 62Protein Degradation and InhibitorsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and Dynamics

In Silico Modeling and Scoring of PROTAC-Mediated Ternary Complex Poses

Open access
Liao, Junzhuo, Nie, Xueqing, Unarta, Ilona Christy, Ericksen, Spencer S., Tang, Weiping·2022·Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) are molecules that induce protein degradation via formation of ternary complexes between an E3 ubiquitin ligase and a target protein. The rational design of PROTACs requires accurate knowledge of the native configuration of the PROTAC-induced ternary complex. This study demonstrates that native and non-native ternary complex poses can be distinguished based on the pose occupancy time in MD, where native poses exhibit longer occupancy times at both room and higher temperatures. Candidate poses are generated by MD sampling and pre-ranked by classic MM/GBSA. A specific heating scheme is then applied to accelerate ternary pose departure, with the pose occupancy time and fraction being measured. This scoring identifies the native pose in all systems tested. Its success is partially attributed to the dynamic nature of pose departure analyses, which accounts for entropic effects typically neglected in the faster static scoring methods, while entropy plays a greater role in protein–protein than in protein–ligand systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c02155

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liao, J., Nie, X., Unarta, I. C., Ericksen, S. S., & Tang, W.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ericksen, Spencer S.
  • Tang, Weiping
Venue
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Published
2022-04-12
Volume
65
Issue
8
Pages
6116-6132
ISSN
  • 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4804
OpenAlex
W4226101063
Cited by
62
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 8
FWCI
4.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (UW2020)
  • Center for Scientific Review (NIH P41-GM103311)
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
PROTACs, ternary complex, E3 ubiquitin ligase, protein degradation, molecular dynamics, entropic effects, protein-protein interaction, PROTAC design
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review