Cited by 27Ubiquitin and proteasome pathwaysEnzyme Structure and FunctionProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

Structural and Biochemical Insights into the Mechanism of Action of the Clinical USP1 Inhibitor, KSQ-4279

Open access
Rennie, Martin Luke, Gundogdu, Mehmet, Arkinson, Connor, Liness, Steven, Frame, Sheelagh, Walden, Helen·2024·Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

DNA damage triggers cell signaling cascades that mediate repair. This signaling is frequently dysregulated in cancers. The proteins that mediate this signaling are potential targets for therapeutic intervention. Ubiquitin-specific protease 1 (USP1) is one such target, with small-molecule inhibitors already in clinical trials. Here, we use biochemical assays and cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) to study the clinical USP1 inhibitor, KSQ-4279 (RO7623066), and compare this to the well-established tool compound, ML323. We find that KSQ-4279 binds to the same cryptic site of USP1 as ML323 but disrupts the protein structure in subtly different ways. Inhibitor binding drives a substantial increase in thermal stability of USP1, which may be mediated through the inhibitors filling a hydrophobic tunnel-like pocket in USP1. Our results contribute to the understanding of the mechanism of action of USP1 inhibitors at the molecular level.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c01184

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Rennie, M. L., Gundogdu, M., Arkinson, C., Liness, S., Frame, S., & Walden, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • University of Dundee (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Rennie, Martin Luke
  • Walden, Helen
Venue
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Published
2024-08-27
Volume
67
Issue
17
Pages
15557-15568
ISSN
  • 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4804
OpenAlex
W4401903557
Cited by
27
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Research Councils UK (MR/W025256/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
USP1, cryptic binding sites, protein thermal stability, DNA damage signaling, DNA repair, inhibitor binding mechanism, protein structure
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Molecular, Protease Inhibitors, Structure-Activity Relationship, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Ubiquitin-Specific Proteases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review