Cited by 10Chemical Synthesis and AnalysisComputational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

HighPlay: Cyclic Peptide Sequence Design Based on Reinforcement Learning and Protein Structure Prediction

Open access
Lin, Huitian, Zhu, Cheng, Shang, Tianfeng, Zhu, Ning, Lin, Kang, Zhang, Chengyun, Shao, Xiang, Wang, Xudong, Duan, Hongliang·2025·Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The structural diversity and good biocompatibility of cyclic peptides have led to their emergence as potential therapeutic agents. Existing cyclic peptide design methods, whether traditional or emerging AI-assisted, rely on a multitude of experiments and face challenges such as limited molecular diversity, high cost, and time-consuming. In this study, we propose HighPlay, which integrates reinforcement learning (MCTS) with the HighFold structural prediction model to design cyclic peptide sequences based solely on the target protein sequence information, to achieve the synergistic optimization of cyclic peptide sequences and binding sites and to dynamically explore the sequence space without the need for predefined target information. The model was applied to the design of cyclic peptide sequences for three different targets, which were screened and verified through molecular dynamics simulations, demonstrating good binding affinity. Specifically, the cyclic peptide sequences designed for the TEAD4 target exhibited micromolar-level affinity in further experimental validation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5c00896

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1038/s41573-020-00135-8 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/s41392-022-00904-4 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.10.003 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/chem.201905385 · DOI
  5. 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.1c00438 · DOI
  6. 10.1039/D1CB00154J · DOI
  7. 10.1111/imm.12889 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/pro.177 · DOI
  9. 10.1021/jacs.8b11099 · DOI
  10. 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00374 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/ja.2011.35 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.5414/CN109325 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/anie.202308251 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.addr.2016.05.009 · DOI
  15. 10.2174/1568026616666160713125555 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/anie.201412070 · DOI
  17. 10.1021/jacs.0c00269 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107792 · DOI
  19. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.582779 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/978-1-60327-159-2_3 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.csbj.2017.04.001 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/s41592-023-02086-5 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1126/science.add1964 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1101/2022.07.23.501214 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/s41586-021-04301-9 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1038/s42256-022-00506-3 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/s41586-022-05172-4 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1038/s41586-023-05732-2 · DOI
  29. 10.1109/TCIAIG.2012.2186810 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1038/s42256-023-00691-9 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/bib/bbae215 · DOI
  32. Vaswani A., 2023, arXiv August 2
  33. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00879 · DOI
  34. 10.1073/pnas.2002449117 · DOI
  35. 10.1111/bjh.17786 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/cbic.201300163 · DOI
  37. 10.1002/pro.2187 · DOI
  38. 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00591 · DOI
  39. 10.1093/nar/gkm276 · DOI
  40. 10.1021/ct400341p · DOI
  41. 10.1021/ct300418h · DOI
  42. 10.3390/s150510481 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Lin, H., Zhu, C., Shang, T., Zhu, N., Lin, K., Zhang, C., Shao, X., Wang, X., & Duan, H.
Affiliations
  • Zhejiang University of Technology (CN)
  • AI department, Shenzhen Highslab Therapeutics. Inc
  • Macao Polytechnic University (MO)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Shao, Xiang
  • Wang, Xudong
  • Duan, Hongliang
Venue
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Published
2025-05-23
Volume
68
Issue
11
Pages
12047-12057
ISSN
  • 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4804
OpenAlex
W4410695808
Cited by
10
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 2
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fundo para o Desenvolvimento das Ci??ncias e da Tecnologia (0151/2024/RIA2)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LD22H300004)
  • Macao Polytechnic University (RP/FCA-07/2024)
  • Pre-research Project of Suzhou Kowloon Hospital (SZJL202203)
  • Suzhou Medical and Health Science and Technology Innovation (SKY2023113)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
reinforcement learning, Monte Carlo tree search, protein structure prediction, TEAD4, binding affinity, molecular dynamics simulation, AI-assisted drug design
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Binding Sites, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Peptides, Cyclic, Protein Conformation, Transcription Factors, Drug Design, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review