Cited by 41Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic CompoundsCyclization and Aryne ChemistryChemical Reactions and Mechanisms

Magnetic Antiaromaticity─Paratropicity─Does Not Necessarily Imply Instability

Open access
Foroutan-Nejad, Cina·2023·The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Abstract

Magnetically induced ring currents are a conventional tool for the characterization of aromaticity. Dia- and paratropic currents are thought to be associated with stabilization (aromaticity) and destabilization (antiaromaticity), respectively. In the present work, I have questioned the validity of the paratropic currents as a measure of antiaromaticity among monocyclic hydrocarbons. I have shown that while reduced/oxidized radical ions of hydrocarbons sustain strong paratropic currents, they often gain extra stabilization via cyclic conjugation compared to their acyclic counterparts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.joc.3c01807

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Foroutan-Nejad calculated magnetically induced ring currents of benzene radical cations and anions, which were strongly paratropic (MICD = -17.3, -47.4 and 12.0 nA/T for radical cation, anion, and neutral benzene, respectively).

    “Foroutan-Nejad calculated magnetically induced ring currents of benzene radical cations and anions, which were strongly paratropic (MICD = -17.3,-47.4 and 12.0 nA/T for radical cation, anion, and neutral benzene, respectively).”

    From Aromaticity and Antiaromaticity: How to Define Them (2025) · cites this paper as [171]

  • Radical anion of 1,2-diazine has higher ISE = 11.2 kcal/mol (ISE = 34.0 kcal/mol for neutral diazine), but also sustains strong paratropic ring current.

    “Radical anion of 1,2-diazine has higher ISE = 11.2 kcal/mol (ISE = 34.0kcal/mol for neutral diazine), but also sustains strong paratropic ring current [171].”

    From Aromaticity and Antiaromaticity: How to Define Them (2025) · cites this paper as [171]

  • Both benzene radical ions are energetically stabilized and have ISE = 7.4 and 6.7 kcal/mol, respectively (ISE = 33.5 kcal/mol for benzene).

    “However, both radical ions are energetically stabilized and have ISE = 7.4 and 6.7 kcal/mol, respectively (ISE = 33.5 kcal/mol for benzene).”

    From Aromaticity and Antiaromaticity: How to Define Them (2025) · cites this paper as [171]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Fernández I.; Frenking G.; Merino G. Aromaticity of Metallabenzenes and Related Compounds. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 6452– 6463. 10.1039/C5CS00004A. 25692666 · DOI
  2. Chen D.; Hua Y.; Xia H. Metallaaromatic Chemistry: History and Development. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 12994– 13086. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00392. 33073994 · DOI
  3. Boldyrev A. I.; Wang L.-S. All-Metal Aromaticity and Antiaromaticity. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105 (10), 3716– 3757. 10.1021/cr030091t. 16218565 · DOI
  4. Boldyrev A. I.; Wang L.-S. Beyond Organic Chemistry: Aromaticity in Atomic Clusters. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18 (17), 11589– 11605. 10.1039/C5CP07465G. 26864511 · DOI
  5. Li X.; Kuznetsov A. E.; Zhang H.-F.; Boldyrev A. I.; Wang L.-S. Observation of All-Metal Aromatic Molecules. Science 2001, 291 (5505), 859– 861. 10.1126/science.291.5505.859. 11157162 · DOI
  6. Cyrański M. K. Energetic Aspects of Cyclic Pi-Electron Delocalization: Evaluation of the Methods of Estimating Aromatic Stabilization Energies. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105 (10), 3773– 3811. 10.1021/cr0300845. 16218567 · DOI
  7. Krygowski T. M.; Cyrański M. K. Structural Aspects of Aromaticity. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101 (5), 1385– 1420. 10.1021/cr990326u. 11710226 · DOI
  8. Feixas F.; Matito E.; Poater J.; Solà M. Quantifying Aromaticity with Electron Delocalisation Measures. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44 (18), 6434– 6451. 10.1039/C5CS00066A. 25858673 · DOI
  9. Gershoni-Poranne R.; Stanger A. Magnetic Criteria of Aromaticity. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44 (18), 6597– 6615. 10.1039/C5CS00114E. 26035305 · DOI
  10. Zhao L.; Grande-Aztatzi R.; Foroutan-Nejad C.; Ugalde J. M.; Frenking G. Aromaticity, the Hückel 4 N+2 Rule and Magnetic Current. ChemistrySelect 2017, 2, 863– 870. 10.1002/slct.201602080. · DOI
  11. Badri Z.; Pathak S.; Fliegl H.; Rashidi-Ranjbar P.; Bast R.; Marek R.; Foroutan-Nejad C.; Ruud K. All-Metal Aromaticity: Revisiting the Ring Current Model among Transition Metal Clusters. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 4789– 4796. 10.1021/ct4007184. 26583397 · DOI
  12. Conradie J.; Foroutan-Nejad C.; Ghosh A. Norcorrole as a Delocalized, Antiaromatic System. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9 (1), 4852 10.1038/s41598-019-39972-y. 30890733 PMC6425022 · DOI
  13. Preethalayam P.; Proos Vedin N.; Radenković S.; Ottosson H. Azaboracyclooctatetraenes Reveal That the Different Aspects of Triplet State Baird-Aromaticity Are Nothing but Different. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2023, 36 (1), e4455 10.1002/poc.4455. · DOI
  14. Radenković S.; Solà M. Aromaticity of Osmaacenes in Their Lowest-Lying Singlet and Triplet States. Inorg. Chem. 2023, 62, 9578 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c01029. 37270703 · DOI
  15. Cuyacot B. J. R.; Foroutan-Nejad C. [{Th(C8H8)Cl2}3]2– Is Stable but Not Aromatic. Nature 2022, 603, E18– E20. 10.1038/s41586-021-04319-z. 35322245 · DOI
  16. Boronski J. T.; Seed J. A.; Hunger D.; Woodward A. W.; van Slageren J.; Wooles A. J.; Natrajan L. S.; Kaltsoyannis N.; Liddle S. T. Reply to: [{Th(C8H8)Cl2}3]2– Is Stable but Not Aromatic. Nature 2022, 603, E21– E22. 10.1038/s41586-021-04320-6. 35322243 · DOI
  17. Cuyacot B. J. R.; Badri Z.; Ghosh A.; Foroutan-Nejad C. Metallaaromaticity – a Protean World. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2022, 24 (45), 27957– 27963. 10.1039/D2CP04846A. 36373574 · DOI
  18. Szczepanik D. W. Bonding in a Crystalline Tri-Thorium Cluster: Not σ-Aromatic But Still Unique. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202204337 10.1002/anie.202204337. PMC9325075 35426215 · DOI
  19. Lin X.; Mo Y. On the Bonding Nature in the Crystalline Tri-Thorium Cluster: Core-Shell Syngenetic σ-Aromaticity. Angew. Chem. 2022, 134, e202209658 10.1002/ange.202209658. PMC9541753 35856937 · DOI
  20. Ottosson H. A Focus on Aromaticity: Fuzzier than Ever Before?. Chem. Sci. 2023, 14 (21), 5542– 5544. 10.1039/D3SC90075D. 37265718 PMC10231423 · DOI
  21. Iwasaki M.; Toriyama K.; Nunome K. E.s.r. Evidence for the Static Distortion of 2E1g Benzene Cations Giving 2B2g with D2h Symmetry in Low Temperature Matrices. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1983, 6, 320– 322. 10.1039/c39830000320. · DOI
  22. Tuttle T. R. Jr.; Weissman S. I. Electron Spin Resonance Spectra of the Anions of Benzene, Toluene and the Xylenes1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80 (20), 5342– 5344. 10.1021/ja01553a005. · DOI
  23. Lindner R.; Müller-Dethlefs K.; Wedum E.; Haber K.; Grant E. R. On the Shape of C6H6+. Science 1996, 271 (5256), 1698– 1702. 10.1126/science.271.5256.1698. · DOI
  24. Dietz F.; Rabinovitz M.; Tadjer A.; Tyutyulkov N. Structure and Energy Spectra of Molecules Containing Anti-Aromatic Ring Systems III. Anti-Aromaticity of Ion Radicals of Benzene and Substituted Benzenes*. Z. Für Phys. Chem. 1995, 191 (1), 15– 22. 10.1524/zpch.1995.191.Part_1.015. · DOI
  25. Mandado M.; Graña A. M.; Pérez-Juste I. Aromaticity in Spin-Polarized Systems: Can Rings Be Simultaneously Alpha Aromatic and Beta Antiaromatic?. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 129 (16), 164114 10.1063/1.2999562. 19045254 · DOI
  26. Andjelković L.; Perić M.; Zlatar M.; Grubišić S.; Gruden-Pavlović M. Magnetic Criteria of Aromaticity in a Benzene Cation and Anion: How Does the Jahn–Teller Effect Influence the Aromaticity?. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53 (7), 794– 799. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.12.008. · DOI
  27. Vedin N. P.; Escayola S.; Radenković S.; Solà M.; Ottosson H. The Lowest Nπ* States of Heteroaromatics: When and in What Way Are They Aromatic or Antiaromatic? ChemRxiv 2023 10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-jx5l5. PMC11163469 38787346 · DOI
  28. Danovich D.; Foroutan-Nejad C.; Hiberty P. C.; Shaik S. Nature of the Three-Electron Bond. J. Phys. Chem. A 2018, 122 (7), 1873– 1885. 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b11919. 29338261 · DOI
  29. Peverati R.; Truhlar D. G. Improving the Accuracy of Hybrid Meta-GGA Density Functionals by Range Separation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2 (21), 2810– 2817. 10.1021/jz201170d. · DOI
  30. Karas L. J.; Jalife S.; Viesser R. V.; Soares J. V.; Haley M. M.; Wu J. I. Tetra-Tert-Butyl-s-Indacene Is a Bond-Localized C2h Structure and a Challenge for Computational Chemistry. Angew. Chem. 2023, 135 (36), e202307379 10.1002/ange.202307379. PMC10528983 37467313 · DOI
  31. Pathak S.; Bast R.; Ruud K. Multiconfigurational Self-Consistent Field Calculations of the Magnetically Induced Current Density Using Gauge-Including Atomic Orbitals. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9 (5), 2189– 2198. 10.1021/ct3011198. 26583713 · DOI
  32. Steiner E.; Fowler P. W. Patterns of Ring Currents in Conjugated Molecules: A Few-Electron Model Based on Orbital Contributions. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105 (41), 9553– 9562. 10.1021/jp011955m. · DOI · Paper page
  33. Gomes J. A. N. F.; Mallion R. B. Aromaticity and Ring Currents. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101 (5), 1349– 1384. 10.1021/cr990323h. 11710225 · DOI
  34. Haigh C. W.; Mallion R. B. Ring Current Theories in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 1979, 13 (4), 303– 344. 10.1016/0079-6565(79)80010-2. · DOI
  35. Schleyer P. v. R.; Puhlhofer F. Recommendations for the Evaluation of Aromatic Stabilization Energies. Org. Lett. 2002, 4 (17), 2873– 2876. 10.1021/ol0261332. 12182577 · DOI
  36. Schleyer P. v. R.; Maerker C.; Dransfeld A.; Jiao H.; van Eikema Hommes N. J. R. Nucleus-Independent Chemical Shifts: A Simple and Efficient Aromaticity Probe. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118 (26), 6317– 6318. 10.1021/ja960582d. 28872872 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foroutan-Nejad, C.
Affiliations
Institute of Organic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kasprzaka 44/52, 01-224 Warsaw, Poland
Venue
The Journal of Organic Chemistry
Published
2023-09-29
Volume
88
Issue
20
Pages
14831-14835
ISSN
  • 0022-3263 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6904
OpenAlex
W4387163425
Cited by
41
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13
FWCI
4.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Organic Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CeON Repository (Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Narodowe Centrum Nauki (2020/39/B/ST4/02022)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Cyclization and Aryne Chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Chemical Reactions and Mechanisms
Keywords
antiaromaticity, radical ions, cyclic conjugation, aromatic stabilization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review