Cited by 15Gene Regulatory Network Analysisstochastic dynamics and bifurcationAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics

Noise Control in Gene Regulatory Networks with Negative Feedback

Open access
Hinczewski, Michael, Thirumalai, D.·2016·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Genes and proteins regulate cellular functions through complex circuits of biochemical reactions. Fluctuations in the components of these regulatory networks result in noise that invariably corrupts the signal, possibly compromising function. Here, we create a practical formalism based on ideas introduced by Wiener and Kolmogorov (WK) for filtering noise in engineered communications systems to quantitatively assess the extent to which noise can be controlled in biological processes involving negative feedback. Application of the theory, which reproduces the previously proven scaling of the lower bound for noise suppression in terms of the number of signaling events, shows that a tetracycline repressor-based negative-regulatory gene circuit behaves as a WK filter. For the class of Hill-like nonlinear regulatory functions, this type of filter provides the optimal reduction in noise. Our theoretical approach can be readily combined with experimental measurements of response functions in a wide variety of genetic circuits, to elucidate the general principles by which biological networks minimize noise.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b02093

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Hinczewski, M., & Thirumalai, D.
Affiliations
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
  • Hinczewski, Michael
  • Thirumalai, D.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2016-05-12
Volume
120
Issue
26
Pages
6166-6177
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W2963419991
Cited by
15
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry B (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (CHE 13-61946)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Keywords
negative feedback, noise reduction, TetR, synthetic gene circuits, response functions, stochastic gene expression
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Fungal Proteins, Models, Genetic, Yeasts, Linear Models, Nonlinear Dynamics, Feedback, Physiological, Gene Regulatory Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review