Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 207

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Machine Learning Model on Simple Features for CO2 Reduction Electrocatalysts

Chen, An, Zhang, Xu, Chen, Letian, Yao, Sai, Zhou, Zhen·2020·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

Electroreduction of CO 2 is one of the most potential ways to realize CO 2 recycle and energy regeneration. The key to promoting this technology is the development of high-performance electrocatalysts. Generally, high-throughput computational screening contributes a lot to materials innovation, but still consumes much time and resource. To achieve efficient exploration of electrocatalysts for CO 2 reduction, we created a machine learning model based on an extreme gradient boosting regression (XGBR) algorithm and simple features. Our screening model successfully and rapidly predicted the Gibbs free energy change of CO adsorption (Δ G CO ) of 1060 atomically dispersed metal–nonmetal codoped graphene systems, and greatly reduced the research cost. The competitive reaction, the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), is also discussed with respect to such a screening model. This work demonstrates the potential of machine learning methods and provides a convenient approach for the effective theoretical design of electrocatalysts for CO 2 reduction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c05964

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 207

Metadata

Authors
Chen, A., Zhang, X., Chen, L., Yao, S., & Zhou, Z.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2020-09-16
Volume
124
Issue
41
Pages
22471-22478
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W3091030757
Cited by
207
References
6
FWCI
5.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.