Spin-Orientation-Dependent O2 Adsorption Mechanism in Fe Single-Atom Catalysts
Abstract
Iron and nitrogen codoped carbon (Fe–N–C) catalysts are promising non-noble catalysts for the electrochemical oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) that is technologically important for fuel cells. As the initial and presumably rate-determining step for the ORR on Fe–N–C catalysts, O 2 adsorption on FeN 4 sites attracts extensive interest. Provided that both Fe ions and O 2 molecules are magnetic, strong spin effects are expected in the O 2 adsorption process, yet a comprehensive understanding of the involved spin effects is still lacking. We here present a theoretical study based on density functional theory on O 2 adsorption over Fe–N–C catalysts, focusing on the effects of Fe spin states, spin orientations, and spin selection rules on the O 2 adsorption process. Our findings show that O 2 adsorption energy strongly depends on the spin states of FeN 4 sites and the spin orientations of Fe and O 2 . Notably, regardless of Fe spin states, the mechanism of O 2 adsorption is spin-orientation dependent: when the O 2 spin is oriented parallel with the spin of Fe, the charge transfer mechanism is preferred, whereas antiparallel spin orientation favors the hybridization mechanism. The spin-orientation-dependent O 2 adsorption mechanism originates from the spin selection rule. These insights are of use not only for fundamental understanding but also for providing guidance on enhancing electrochemical reactions through manipulating spin states and spin coupling by applying an external magnetic field.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 13
- Authors
- Xie, J., & Duan, Z.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Duan, Zhiyao
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2024-12-04
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 49
- Pages
- 20819-20826
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W4405004497
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6
- FWCI
- 0.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (52272238)
- Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (2022JM-097)
- Key Research and Development Plan of Tibet Autonomous Region (XZ202401ZY0043)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Metal-Catalyzed Oxygenation Mechanisms
- Keywords
- Fe-N-C catalysts, single-atom catalysts, iron spin state, spin orientation, spin selection rules, oxygen reduction reaction, Fe-N4 active sites, charge transfer mechanism, orbital hybridization, external magnetic field
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review