The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural and Electronic Features of β-Ni(OH)2 and β-NiOOH from First Principles
Abstract
NiO x, long studied for its use in nickel-based secondary batteries, has been the subject of much recent interest due to its efficacy as an oxygen evolution catalyst. Despite extensive study over more than a century, however, many outstanding questions remain surrounding both the structure and the activity of NiO x . Further compounding this ambiguity is the recent finding that much of the previous experimental work on NiO x may have been influenced by incidental doping. Here, we report a computational study of the two simplest members of the NiO x family: β-Ni(OH) 2 and β-NiOOH. Using DFT+ U calculations, we first identify a β-NiOOH structure with a staggered arrangement of intercalated protons that is more consistent with experimental crystal structures of β-NiOOH than previously proposed geometries. Next, by conducting a thorough study of various initial spin configurations of this β-NiOOH structure, we found that a low-spin d 7 Ni 3+ configuration is always favored, which suggests a Jahn–Teller distortion, rather than disproportionation, explains the different Ni–O bond distances found in experiment. G 0 W 0 calculations performed on β-Ni(OH) 2 and β-NiOOH reveal electronic structures consistent with previous experimental results. Lastly, calculations of various low-index surface energies of both β-Ni(OH) 2 and β-NiOOH demonstrate that the (001) surface is the most thermodynamically stable surface, in keeping with numerous experimental results but in contrast to recent computational models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Insights into Current Limitations of Density Functional Theory
Cohen, A. J., Mori-Sánchez, P., & Yang, W. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1158722 · Cited by 2,527
Cited by
NiFe‐Based (Oxy)hydroxide Catalysts for Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Non‐Acidic Electrolytes
Dionigi, F., & Strasser, P. (2016) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201600621 · Cited by 1,039
Zheng, X., Zhang, B., De Luna, P., Liang, Y., Comin, R., Voznyy, O., Han, L., García de Arquer, F. P., Liu, M., Dinh, C. T., et al. (2018) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.2886 · Cited by 657
Recent Progress of Amorphous Nanomaterials
Kang, J., Yang, X., Hu, Q., Cai, Z., Liu, L.-M., & Guo, L. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00229 · Cited by 398
Mastering Surface Reconstruction of Metastable Spinel Oxides for Better Water Oxidation
Duan, Y., Sun, S., Sun, Y., Xi, S., Chi, X., Zhang, Q., Ren, X., Wang, J., Ong, S. J. H., Du, Y., et al. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201807898 · Cited by 339
Guo, Y., Guo, D., Ye, F., Wang, K., & Shi, Z. (2017) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.05.195 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Tkalych, A. J., Yu, K., & Carter, E. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-10-20
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 43
- Pages
- 24315-24322
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2298904944
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.