The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hindered Translator and Hindered Rotor Models for Adsorbates: Partition Functions and Entropies
Open accessAbstract
Abstract With the recent explosion in computational catalysis and related microkinetic modeling, the need for a fast yet accurate way to predict equilibrium and rate constants for surface reactions has become more important. Here we present a fast and accurate new method to estimate the partition functions and entropies of adsorbates based on quantum mechanical estimates of the potential energy surface. As with previous approaches, it uses the harmonic oscillator (HO) approximation for most of the modes of motion of the adsorbate. However, it uses hindered translator and hindered rotor models for the three adsorbate modes associated with motions parallel to the surface and evaluates these using an approach based on a method that has proven accurate in modeling the internal hindered rotations of gas molecules. The adsorbate entropies were calculated with this method for four adsorbates (methanol, propane, ethane, and methane) on Pt(111) using density functional theory (DFT) to evaluate the potential energy surface and are shown to be in very good agreement with experiments, better than using only the HO approximation. The translational and rotational contributions to the entropy of a hindered translator/hindered rotor are very closely approximated by the corresponding harmonic oscillator entropy (within 0.46 R) when the barrier exceeds kT and by the entropy of an ideal 2D monatomic gas of the same mass and a free 1D rotor with the same moment of inertia, respectively (within 0.12 R), when the barrier is less than kT. However, the harmonic oscillator/lattice gas model severely overestimates the entropy when kT exceeds the barrier.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Degree of Rate Control: A Powerful Tool for Catalysis Research
Campbell, C. T. (2017) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.7b00115 · Cited by 572
Self-citationMicrokinetic Modeling: A Tool for Rational Catalyst Design
Motagamwala, A. H., & Dumesic, J. A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00394 · Cited by 485
Computational Methods in Heterogeneous Catalysis
Chen, B. W. J., Xu, L., & Mavrikakis, M. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01060 · Cited by 447
First-principles-based multiscale modelling of heterogeneous catalysis
Bruix, A., Margraf, J. T., Andersen, M., & Reuter, K. (2019) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-019-0298-3 · Cited by 339
Methods for nitrogen activation by reduction and oxidation
Iriawan, H., Andersen, S. Z., Zhang, X., Comer, B. M., Barrio, J., Chen, P., Medford, A. J., Stephens, I. E. L., Chorkendorff, I., & Shao-Horn, Y. (2021) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-021-00053-y · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Sprowl, L. H., Campbell, C. T., & Árnadóttir, L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-04-28
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 9719-9731
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2324305990
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hindered Translator and Hindered Rotor Models for Adsorbates: Partition Functions and Entropies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b11616
- The paper
- Sprowl, L. H., Campbell, C. T., & Árnadóttir, L. (2016). Hindered Translator and Hindered Rotor Models for Adsorbates: Partition Functions and Entropies. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b11616
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.