Cited by 50Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies

First-Principles Predictions of Structure–Function Relationships of Graphene-Supported Platinum Nanoclusters

Shi, Hongbo, Auerbach, Scott M., Ramasubramaniam, Ashwin·2016·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

Platinum-based materials play an important role as electrocatalysts in energy conversion technologies. Graphene-supported Pt nanoclusters were recently found to be promising electrocatalysts for fuel-cell applications due to their enhanced activity and tolerance to CO poisoning as well as their long-term stability toward sintering. However, structure–function relationships that underpin the improved performance of these catalysts are still not well understood. Here, we employ a combination of empirical potential simulations and density functional theory (DFT) calculations to investigate structure–function relationships of small Pt N ( N = 2–80) clusters on model carbon (graphene) supports. A bond-order empirical potential is employed within a genetic algorithm to go beyond local optimizations in obtaining minimum-energy structures of Pt N clusters on pristine as well as defective graphene supports. Point defects in graphene strongly anchor Pt clusters and also appreciably affect the morphologies of small clusters, which are characterized via various structural metrics such as the radius of gyration, average bond length, and average coordination number. A key finding from the structural analysis is that the fraction of potentially active surface sites in supported clusters is maximized for stable Pt clusters in the size range of 20–30 atoms, which provides a useful design criterion for optimal utilization of the precious metal. Through selected ab initio studies, we find a consistent trend for charge transfer from small Pt clusters to defective graphene supports resulting in the lowering of the cluster d-band center, which has implications for the overall activity and poisoning of the catalyst. The combination of a robust empirical potential-based genetic algorithm for structural optimization with ab initio calculations opens up avenues for systematic studies of supported catalyst clusters at much larger system sizes than are accessible to purely ab initio approaches.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b01288

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shi, H., Auerbach, S. M., & Ramasubramaniam, A.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Corresponding author
  • Auerbach, Scott M.
  • Ramasubramaniam, Ashwin
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2016-05-31
Volume
120
Issue
22
Pages
11899-11909
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W2403333583
Cited by
50
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy (DE-SC0010610)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Keywords
platinum nanoclusters, graphene-supported catalysts, structure-function relationship, bond-order potential, defective graphene, charge transfer, d-band center, fuel cell catalysts, CO tolerance, cluster size effects, cluster morphology, precious metal utilization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review